Nibiru 니비루 니비루는, 전투행성으로 알려져 있다. 이 행성은, 대 말데크전에 투입된 인조행성으로서, 지구인인 우리에게 전달되는 정보로는, 플레이아데스인들이 우주의 자유, 정의, 평화를 위하여 건조한 전투행성으로 알려진다. 행성의 크기는 지구보다 월등하게 커서, 말데크maldek행성 크기에 버금가는 것으로 추정되다. Maldek(태양계제5행성급, 지구크기의 약 10배이상 12배정도로 추정) 내파를 위해서 투입된 이 전투행성은, 우리가 추론하건대는, Andromeda Galaxy곤충종족수장놈 냉기치놈과, Lyra주신놈들이 합세하여(안드로메다은하계 주신단 놈들 전원이 합세하다), Andromeda Galaxy이전 계까지 소급하여 말데크파괴의 기술을 전수받고 특수제작한 행성이라는 점이다. 플레이아데스에서 만든 행성이 아니다. maldek는, 우주역사에서 악당으로서 알려져 있지만, 우리가 목격관찰하거나 확인한 바로는 악당이 아니며, 차라리 안드로메다은하계놈들보다 하위우주의 하위종족들 측면에서는 더 나은 면모를 가진다. 지구가 속한 영역은, space-universe로서 누군가가 의도하여 만든 우주이며, 보통 space라고 부른다. 누군가가 인위적으로 의도하여 만드는 우주는 space급이라고 볼수 있고, 이 space급의 우주를 만드는 또 다른 거대인위생성영역을 Universe로 볼수 있으며, 인위적이 아닌, 우주황금율에 의하여 창조되는 영역을 Cosmos로 부를수 있다. 보통은 우리가 사는 Galaxy은하계를 Universe로 볼수도 있고, 이 Galaxy내에 생성되는 각 grade별 영역과 차원의 구분들을 space로 볼수 있다. 그리고 이러한 Galaxy가 무수하게 산재한 거대우주를 Cosmos로 볼수 있겠다. 우리가 보통 말하는 제1우주, 제2우주등의 구분들은, 인위적인 구분으로서, 이 인위우주를 만든 자들이 가진 기준에 의해서 그렇게 이름붙여진 것이고 실제로는 다른 계로 갈 경우, 별로 의미가 없는데, 기초 알고리즘과 사상체계가 다르기 때문이다. 이 등급기준을 만든 자들은 바로 안드로메다은하계놈들이다. Maldek내파는 대단히 중요하다. 이 Maldek내파사건은, 우주악마마귀들의 대규모발흥을 유발하고, 우리가 사는 은하계 전체에 무한대의 학살과 파괴, 멸족을 유발했기 때문이다. Andromeda Galaxy는 현대지구로 오게 되면, 마치 우주성자집단이라거나 혹은 우주해탈고차원문명으로 잘못 인식된다. 우리도 한때는 그렇게 보았는데, 여기와서 확인한 결과는 우주 최고의 악독함과 잔인함, 편협함을 지닌 종족집단체로서, 보통 우리가 인간류, 인류, 포유류영장류, 휴먼종들로 인식하는 지구인들의 보편적 문명인식체계와는 전혀 다른 집단구조체계를 가지는 것으로 보였다. 보통 파충류12개종족, 파충류종족들이 악독하고 잔인하고 무자비한 것으로 알려져 있지만, 우리가 확인한 결과로는, 이들보다 더 악독하고 잔인하고 편협한 종족집단체가 안드로메다은하계 185개종족집단체들이다. 이들을 대표하는 집단은 제2차은하대전우주와 라이라우주이다. 그리고 플레이아데스로 불리는 영역과 차원이다. 이들의 악독함과 잔인함, 편협함은, 알려진바대로, 우리 은하계 우주에 무려 56500배에 달하는 악랄하기 이를데 없는 폭정과 폭행, 학살과 멸족사태를 유발시킨다. 보통 허용되는 범주는 약 40000배로 알려져 있다.(과거의 과오,악업대비 가해비율) maldek을 내파시키려고 냉기치(제2차은하대전위원장이자 12인의 제2차은하대전장군들 한놈이며, 안드로메다은하계 최악의 독종집단체 곤충종족수장놈 고냉기치)는 라이라 최고주신놈들과 합세하여 온갖 지랄을 다 쳐댄다. 그중에 하나가 이건희프로젝트이다. 그리고 플레이아데스프로젝트(세븐시스터즈프로젝트, 박종권지구인을 지구역사최초이자 마지막으로 플레이아데스인으로 승천시킨다는 위증거짓의 프로젝트)이다. 우리가 확인한 바로는, 이 세븐시스터즈프로젝트는 MALDEK수장을 유인하여 제정신을 못차리게 한후, 은하계중앙의 황금용을 만들어준다는 구실로 유혹하여, MALDEK이 처한 위급한 상황을 인식하지 못하게 만들고, 결국 안드로메다은하계놈들이 파놓은 함정에 빠지게 한후, 니비루 행성을 동원한 말데크내파공격을 방어하지 못하게 만들기 위한 교활한 술책이다. MALDEK수장은, 기묘한 인연관계로서 박종권이와 가족관계를 가지게 되는데, 요것도 안드로메다은하계놈들의 교활사특한 술수다. 그리고는 아무것도 모르게 된 하층지구인박종권이를 부처놈의 설레발이, 예수놈의 설레발이로 유인하여, 라이라집단체와 플레이아데스집단체에 호감을 가지게 한후, 이른바 플레이아데스프로젝트라는 것을 실행시키고, 특혜를 주고 복락을 주는 것처럼 위위장하며, 얼간이 박종권이를 속여넘긴 것이다. 물론 전부 속기만 한 건 아니다. 다만 하층지구인으로서 알수 있는 것에는 제한이 있으므로 그렇게 되는데, 그렇게 만든 놈이 JEHOVAH놈들이다.(JEHOVAH원대, JEHOVAH2대,JEHOVA4대 및 전체 JEHOVAH7인이 전부 그런 짓을 하다) 이건희프로젝트 기간중에는, 박종권이의 상원신을 잡아서 포획하는 일에 주력하게 하고, 하원신은 이미 그 이전에 노예상태로 포박한 상태에서 전지구인(지배계층)에게 나눠먹게 하고, 시기와 때에 걸맞지 않는 첨단의식화를 강제무단공유하게 만든다. 요것도 여호와 2대, 4대놈 짓이다. 게다가 이 지구인이라고 불리는 종족은 실제 지구인은 단 한명도 없고, 전부 거의 TELLURIAN, TERRAN수준인 사람이 아닌 이상한 존재들이다. tellurian (plural tellurians) (astronomy, historical) Alternative spelling of tellurion (“instrument used to show how the rotation of the Earth on its axis and its orbit around the Sun cause day and night and the seasons”) (chiefly science fiction) Alternative letter-case form of Tellurian (“inhabitant of the planet Earth”) 텔루리안이란, 초자연적인 존재로서(지구인인간으로서 보면 그렇다) 보통 지구궤도와 지구축을 지지하고 유지하는 역할을 하거나 혹은 그러한 역할을 하면서 지구에서 사는 거주민들로 설명되고 있다. 이는 일반적으로는 인간존재가 할수 있는 일이 아니고, 초자연적인 원리들로서의 어떤 존재들이 할 일이다. 그런데 이런 자들을 두고 지구인이라고 사전에 표시된다. 어처구니가 없다. 우리가 이승만씨를 통해서 확인한 바로는 텔루리안은 선비족을 의미한다. 우리는 도대체 이해가 안 가는데, 초자연적인 존재(하층지구인 인간사람의 눈으로 보면 그렇다)혹은, 인간류사람보다는 월등하게 발전된 외행성적존재로서의 어떤 의미를 가지는 실체들로서 우리는 텔루리안을 이해했는데, 선비족은, 하등하급 원시미개인을 대표한다는 점이다. 그런데 선비족이 텔루리안이다. 이상하다. 인간존재의 입장에서는 이를테면, 신선도사급 혹은 산신령같은 초월적 실체들이 텔루리안이어야 하는데, 미개원시야만의 대표주자 플레이아데스놈들이 그런 식으로 만들어놓은 것 같다. 게다가 이들은, 인간존재, 하층지구인들보다 더 이기적이고 더 탐욕스럽고 더 시기, 질투하고, 더 잔인하고 악독하다. 실제로는 인간보다 더 나을 것이 없고, 오히려 더 못한 존재들로서 일종의 악마들인데, 어처구니가 없는 것이다. 요 플레이아데스놈들이 어떤 존재들인지는 이들이 벌려놓은 짓거리마다 확인가능하다. 이들이 말하는 등급이라는 것은, 아수라 등급이고 별로 의미가 없는데, 보통 CIVILIZATION이라고 불리는 문명집단체에서는 허락되지 아니하는 원시야만미개의 등급이기 때문이다. 주로 사람때려죽이는 기술, 다른 사람것 빼앗는 기술, 다른 사람정신의식혼백을 제압시키는 기술들인데, 그런 기술을 잘 쓰고 강력한 힘을 발휘하여 웬만한 놈이면 다 때려죽일수 있는 파워만 있으면 등급이 높다고 말하는 것은 안드로메다은하계잡놈들이다. 도대체 어떻게 요런 새끼들이 우주최고의 지위에 있는지 우리는 도저히 이해할수 없다. 이기심, 시기심, 질투심, 탐욕심, 자기만족추구심, 자기쾌락몰두심 같은 요소들은 전혀 무관한데, 그 이유를 보면, 이들 같은 경우는 막상 마음만 먹으면 뭐든 다 할수 있기 때문이다. 다만 이들이 사람이 되면(거짓투사되면 FALSE INJECTTION) 이기심, 시기심, 질투심, 탐욕심등이 인간과 똑같이 생기는데, 그 생기는 강도가 인간의 수십 수백배에 달하고, 만일 만족되지 못하면 무슨 짓이든 다 해서라도 그것을 만족시키려 하는 하등인간의 전형을 보이는 일종의 악마나 마귀들에 지나지 않는다는 점이다. 그러나 등급은 높게 매겨지는데, 그게 안드로메다은하계놈들의 실제 원본원적정체이다. 극단적 원시미개야만성을 지닌 놈들이 안드로메다은하계놈들이다. 게다가 이들의 주요문제점중 하나는 인색함, 편협함이다. 실제로는 전부 모두가 쓰고도 남을 자원과 양식이 그득하다. 그런데도 이들은 대부분의 우주에서 극단적 궁핍과 고난을 강제한다. 이게 미친새끼들이다. 특히 플레이아데스놈들의 인색함과 편협함은 극단에 이른다. 이들은 악업 KARMA를 부르짖지만, 절대로 그게 아니다. 이들이 지나간 세월 過去惡業으로 인해서 그렇게 했다고 주장하는 일들을 보면, 거의 대부분이, 허용범주를 초과하는 加害이기 때문이다. 일단 우리의 은하계 전체를 놓고 보면, 과거악업이나 잘못들 대비 무려 56500배에 달하는 추가적가해가 자행된다. 보통 우리가 들은 정보로는 일반적으로는 대부분 3600배에 달하는 加害를 당한다. 이것은 은하계 전체규모와는 다른 종족차원이거나 어떤 문명집단차원의 구분화된 가해규모들이다. 개인적인 가해규모도 어마어마해서, 박종권이 같은 경우는 개인적인 과오,잘못,악업대비 무려 8000배가 넘은 무서운 가해를 당했다고 알려진다. 보통 ANDROMEDA GALAXY에서 허용하는 범주는 개인적인 경우는 과거과오, 잘못, 악업대비 12배이내의 처벌이다. 집단종족의 경우는 과거과오, 잘못, 악업대비 약84배이내의 처벌이다. 은하계 전체규모를 본다면, 과거과오, 잘못, 악업대비 약 40000배이내의 처벌이다. 이러한 기준과 허용범주를 참조한다면 이들이 얼마나 악독하고 잔인한 가해를 자행하고 있는지에 대한 증거가 될 것이다. 게다가 요 새끼들이 주력하는 처벌방식은 주로 가난과 궁핍, 헐벗고 굶주리는 것이다. 우리가 목격한 것들은 전체 은하계를 다 살수 있는 정도의 재물과 돈들이 플레이아데스에 산더미처럼 쌓여있다. 전체은하계를 돈주고 살수 있으면 다 살수도 있는 어마어마한 금액의 재물들이 플레이아데스에서 쌓여있지만, 요 새끼들이 얼마나 인색하고 편협한지는 이미 지구시스템의 자본주의를 통해서 잘 알려져 있다. 우리는 산더미처럼 쌓여 있는 우주금괴를 목격관찰했다. 어마어마하다. 플레이아데스다. 그러나 한놈도 예외없이 인색하고 편협하고 까다롭다. 삼성놈들 방식인데, 이건희,이재용이를 보고 삼성놈들을 보면 이 자들이 어떤 방식으로 재물과 돈을 보고 처리하는지 이해할수 있다. 우리는 이런 놈들을 위해서 1,280조원에 달하는 거대한 기여공헌을 했다. 그리고 우리의 기여공헌을 실제 원본심으로는 말로 표현할수 없을정도로 인색편협한 놈인 이건희,이재용이 놈이 자기들이 했다고 증거를 위증하려고 광분하고 있다. 그러나 우리가 보건대는, 이자들은 비록 그렇게 할 능력과 등급이 되더라도 절대로 그렇게 하지 않을 것이라는 점이다. 그게 안드로메다은하계 계열놈들이 가지는 주요 특징이다. 라이라놈들도 마찬가지다. 플레이아데스놈들도 마찬가지다. 源本心 源本來的自己自身的源本人의 源本質상 절대로 그렇게 할 놈들이 아니라는 점은, 플레이아데스놈들이 제놈들 역사기간 1兆年간 좋은 일을 한번도 한 적이 없다는 역사적 사실에서 증거된다. 이들 주장대로 보면, 딱 한번 했다고 주장하는데, 우리가 보면 그렇게 할 놈들이 아니다. 만일 했다면 박종권 플레이아데스인이 그렇게 했을 것이다. 위의 사진그림들은 MALDEK를 내파시키려고 만든 NIBIRU행성의 모습이다. 지구대비 수십배의 크기에 달하는데, 이 정도 행성을 만들려면 적어도 안드로메다은하계급이거나 배후에서 지원해주는 다른 등급이 되어야 할 것 같은 것으로 추정되다. MALDEK내파는, 이건희프로젝트와 플레이아데스프로젝트를 통해서 박종권이를 이용해서 말데크를 파괴하려는 의도로서 안드로메다은하계 냉기치놈과 라이라주신놈들, 안드로메다은하계주신놈들의 공동모의한 결과로 목격관찰되다. 결국 말데크(고말데크)수장이 이 놈들 술수에 말려들어서, 은하계황금용이 되는 과정을 밟는데, 그 과정에서 냉기치놈과 라이라주신놈들, 안드로메다은하계주신놈들이 타고 들어온다. 그리고는 최근접점까지 타고들어와서 기회를 노리다가 지구인으로 위위형되어진 말데크수장을 내리친 것이다. 그리고 그러한 기세를 몰아서 다시 말데크행성을 직격공격하여 말데크수장과 같은 의식상태로 위위형되어져 속고 있던 말데크인 전원을 폭사시킨 것이다. 여기에 동원된 주요 악당무법자놈들은 Pleiades 4 big Outrageous Fellow 플레이아데스4대무법자로 알려진 미마스, 프타, 아루스, 오자와 네놈이다. 요 새끼들은 전원 박종권으로 위위형하고 거짓투사했는데, 플레이아데스인 전체가 박종권으로 거짓투사되었으며, 니비루인 전체도 박종권으로 거짓투사한다. 이어서 안드로메다은하계주신놈들도 전원 박종권으로 거짓투사한 상태에서 전력을 다해서 말데크인들의 의식을 교란왜곡시키고, 박종권이로 완벽하게 위장한 안드로메다은하계주신 두놈이 말데크수장을 직격하여 내리치면서 니비루 전투위성에서 공명탄을 발사하는데, 요것도 안드로메다은하계를 배후지원하는 식인귀무리들이 만들어준 어떤 다른 영역과 차원에서 발사된 공명자폭탄들인 것으로 추정된다. 이런 사태를 예감한 것은 오래전이다. 우리는 은하계 황금용으로 되어진 말데크수장을 무섭게 노려본다. 정신을 차리라는 의미로 그렇게 했을 것이다. 문제의 핵심은 그 이후의 일이다. 말데크를 내파시키는데 성공한 안드로메다은하계놈들과 이들의 수족이 되는 제2차은하대전군세(12인의 장군들이며 이들중 11인이 안드로메다인들이다)와 플레이아데스군세(4대무법자놈들)이 합세하여 全體銀河系로 進軍해가기 始作한 것이다. 그리고 이것만이 아니다. 안드로메다은하계와 同級의 他界를 攻擊하여(말데크를 내파시킨 기술을 응용하여, 제놈들과 동급수준의 발전된 다른세계를 공격하다) 그 세계 전체에 致命打를 입히고 內破시키려 試圖한다. 요것도 전부 유사휴먼종족이었던 고위등급의 박종권원체를 복제복사하여 안드로메다은하계주신놈들이 전부 처발라 입고, 전원이 박종권유사휴먼인으로 위장하여 접근한후, 그렇게 자행했을 것임은 매우 분명하다. 이와같은 만행들은 결국 은하계 전체 주민들을 무서운 살육과 파괴 학살과 멸족의 대재앙으로 몰고 간다. 요 씹새끼들이 주로 쓰는 수법은 유사휴먼종족계의 고위등급인 박종권이를 복제 복사하여 위위형하고 거짓투사하여 완벽하게 선량하고 좋은 의도를 가진 휴먼인으로 위위장하고 상대에게 접근해서 뒤통수를 치는 수법이다. 요 씨팔놈들의 발호는 고위휴먼계 상천계까지 침투하여, 휴먼계열 전체를 파멸시키고 이들 전체에 대해서 통제장악하려는 음모,흉계까지 겹치고 있다. 만일 그렇게 된다면 더 큰 비극과 재앙이 초래될 것이다. MALDEK을 내파시키는데 최고최대의 공헌을 한 놈은 이재용이 놈이고 이건희놈이다. 요 두놈이 무수한 학살과 멸족을 자행하게 만든 기본원인이유들이 된다. 이재용이 놈은, 니비루인들의 약 75%에 달하고, 플레이아데스인들의 약 65%에 달하는 대표캐릭터로서 실제로는 전체플레이아데스인들이 모두 이재용이 놈이다. 이재용이 놈이 박종권이를 완전히 죽인 놈중 한놈이고 요 새끼가 살인도 불사하여 이미 나를 살인한 것으로 추론된다. 실제 지구인인간박종권이를 살인했다고 판단된다. 그리고 요 새끼가 말데크를 파멸시킨 공로로서, 17개성단의 지도자로 추대된다. 이어서 플레이아데스제2대조사놈이 되더니, 결국에는 준은하대전계까지 박종권이 것을(박종권이를 살인하여 죽인후 가둔다 그리고 이용해 처 먹는다) 도둑질강탈질하여 가지고, 올라간다. 요 새끼가 바로 말데크 공격으로 멸절된 이른바 4000만명의 준은하대전인들을 지도한 놈의 정체다. 대과거로 거슬러가는데, 이 우주에서의 시공간개념이란 지구인이 아는바와 같지 않다는 점만 알아두자. 그리고 요 새끼가 지구에서는 삼성그룹회장직으로 있는 이재용이 놈이다. 전부 같은 이재용이 놈이다. 이것이 가능하다는 것은, 웬만한 놈들이면 다 안다. 가능하다. MALDEK를 내파시키고, 전체은하계 원주민들을 대규모 학살멸족처리되게 만들며, 아틀란티스인 전체를 멸족시키는데 결정적 공헌과 기여를 한 이재용이와 이건희를 무조건 참수형에 처하고 무조건 죽여없애도록 지시명령처리기록되다. 요 두 새끼는 그대로 둘 경우, 안드로메다은하계와 동급의 타계까지 공격해서 다른 대규모 우주에 대재앙을 초래할 대단히 위험한 재앙들에 해당되므로 무조건 발견 즉시 죽여버리도록 지시명령처리기록되다. 아울러서 이 두놈에 의하여 완전히 잡아 먹히다 시피한 박종권이를 무슨 수를 써서라도 원상회복토록 조치토록 지시명령처리기록되다.(불가능할 경우 탈출로를 확보토록 지시명령처리기록되다.)MALDEK을 내파시키기 이전의 NIBIRU놈들과 PLEIADES놈들을 집중공격하여 멸족시키며, MALDEK의 내파를 최대한 방어토록 지시명령처리기록되다. MURDEK, MALDEK는 LYRA, PLEIADES계열들을 무조건 멸족처리해야 할 것으로 지시명령처리기록되다. 아울러서 ANDROMEDA GALAXY놈들과 일전을 치를 각오로서 대결해야 하는 것으로서 지시명령처리기록되다. 안드로메다은하계놈들과 라이라놈들, 플레이아데스놈들이 이미 박종권이 원본을 다 빨아 처 먹은 것으로 판단되므로 이후 박종권이 및 박종권계열인으로 위위장하여 거짓투사하여 나타나는 놈들에 대해서 무조건 살해사형제거소멸토록 지시명령처리기록되다. drawathe李健熙이건희1942年1月9日-2020年10月25日三星创始人李秉喆三子三星集团第二任会长authorityhypostasisanatomy drawathe李健熙-ic이건희-ic1942年1月9日-2020年10月25日三星创始人李秉喆三子三星集团第二任会长-icauthorityhypostasisanatomy-ic drawathe李健熙-y이건희-y1942年1月9日-2020年10月25日三星创始人李秉喆三子三星集团第二任会长-yauthorityhypostasisanatomy-y drawathe李健熙이건희1942年1月9日-2020年10月25日三星创始人李秉喆三子三星集团第二任会长authorityhypostasisanatomy drawathe李健熙的이건희的1942年1月9日-2020年10月25日的三星创始人李秉喆三子三星集团第二任会长的authorityhypostasisanatomy的 drawathe2ndgalaxywar12Theleaderorcommanderofanarmyauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawathe地球人지구인tellurianEarthpersonearthmanearthwomanEarthianEarthling準同級他界authorityhypostasisanatomy drawatheĀtlantis準同級他界quasi-tobeonthesameleveldifferentcivilizationauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawatheSevenSisters準同級他界quasi-tobeonthesameleveldifferentstarclusterauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawathe地球人지구인tellurianEarthpersonearthmanearthwomanEarthianEarthlingauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawathe2ndgalaxywar準同級他界authorityhypostasisanatomy drawatheAndromeda Galaxy準同級他界authorityhypostasisanatomy drawatheAndromeda Galaxy同級他界authorityhypostasisanatomy drawathethe devilauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawathereptilereptilologyauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawatheReptiliaherpetologyreptologyauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawathethereptilereptiliannesspainterlinessperennialistsauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawathereptilianareptilereptiliousreptitiousreptilelikeThesaurusauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawatheThesaurusdespicablereptilianbrainTiplerianpatrilineauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawathePrinceofDarknessThesaurusSatanauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawathepowerofdarknessdevildomdevildemonLuciferBeelzebubafreetfoulfiendauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawathetellurianunliteraltellurionearthlytelluricterreneterrestrialauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawatheEarthpersonEarthpersonsEarthpeopleThesaurusEarthlingauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawatheEarthwomanEarthwomenThesaurusEarthlingauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawatheEarthmanEarthmenEartherEarthlingThesaurusEarthlingauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawatheEarthianRhaetianRhætianThesaurusEarthlingauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawatheEarthgirlEartherEarthlingThesaurusEarthlingrealrightauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawatheearthlinghalteringheartlinglatheringrealthingauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawathedevilryOldNickOldSerpentThesaurusSatanevilizevilifyauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawathedevilincarnatedesignerlessgostcompassionatedemonophobiaalightauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawatheanincarnatefienddopefiendlubberfiendarch-fiendhellspawnauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawatheritualabuseBiellaApollyonhoàngtheprinceofthisworldauthorityhypostasisanatomy drawathedemondevilmaliciousspiritmahoundmodendaimonAmidonImondadomainauthorityhypostasisanatomy ATLANTIS를 내파시킨 기술은 MALDEK을 내파시킨 기술을 응용한 것이며, ATLANTIS인들은 이점을 감안하여 판단토록 지시명령처리기록되다. ANDROMEDA GALAXY와 同級의 他界 聯合元老院 ANDROMEDA GALAXY와 準同級의 他界 聯合元老院 제2차은하대전계와 同級의 他界 聯合元老院 제2차은하대전계와 準同級의 他界 聯合元老院 MURDEK연합원로원 MALDEK연합원로원 ATLANTIS연합원로원 참조 ---------------------------------------------- 이승만대통령이 과거 머물렀다고 알려진 제주도 여관 사진이 올라온다. 그런데 이상하다. 우리가 보면, 너무도 누추하고 초라하다. 우리는 경제문외한이라서 잘 모른다. 하지만, 아무리 못사는 나라라고 해도, 부자는 있고, 세금도 걷는다. 게다가 국가원수면, 아무리 가난하고 궁핍해도, 이른바 통치자금들이 있기 마련이다. 그리고 비록 돈이 없다고 해도, 건물하나 짓는건, 조선왕조시대에도 왕명하나면 그냥 짓는다. 아니 고조선시대라고 해도 왕이 마음만 먹으면 그럴듯한 건물하나 짓는건 돈이 있고 없고의 문제가 아니다. 돈문제가 아니고, 통치전략이다. 미국을 대상으로 구걸하려고 그런 짓을 한 것 같다는 추론이다. 우리가 대통령인데, 제주도 가서 이런 여관에서 잠을 잡니다라고 하소연하기 위한 홍보전략이다. 북한 같은 경우는 이른바 주석궁이니 뭐니 해서 그런 초라한 꼴은 보이지 않는다. 이 문제는 민심이나 기타 다른 문제와는 무관계하다. 각 지역별로 국가정책상, 깨끗하고 정갈한 호텔하나정도는 국가시책으로 짓게 하면 그만이다. 내가 대통령이면 그렇게 한다. 우리가 알기로는 일제시대에도 부자가 많았다. 회사운영하고 일제와 밀착해서 돈을 번 부자들이 제법 있었다고 안다. 일본제국시대의 위위형박종권(이 사람이 나인지는 모르겠다. 하지만 그런 것처럼 설레발이를 친다)이는 50원을 받았다고 말해진다. 이 당시 월급 50원이면 많이 받는거다. 교사봉급이 20원정도 했다고 하는데 많이 받은거다. 하지만 막상 박종권이인지는 모른다. 국제외교정책상, 구걸은 하지 말자. 태국을 가면 왕궁을 비롯해서 볼거리가 많다. 베트남도 가면 불란서 시대의 유풍들이 많고 나라 전체가 초라하지 않다. 베트남은, 하노이같은 경우는 호숫가에서 커피를 마시고 운치있게 지낼수 있는 장소도 있고, 건물들은 대부분 프랑스 불란서방식의 운치있는 건물들이다. 그러나 이 나라의 공식 GDP는 고작 500불선이다. 이정도는 이승만 정권당시의 한국과 유사한 수준이다. 공식 GDP는 그렇지만 막상 가보면, 그렇게 초라하지 않다. 운치있고 볼만하다. 오히려 한국보다 나아보인다. 못먹고 못산다고 주절대던 시대는 베트남 수준이다. 그러나 베트남은 그렇지 않다. 태국도 고작 2000불 수준이다. 그것도 현대에 와서도 그렇다. 하지만 가보면 그게 아니다. 태국방콕 호텔이 얼마나 좋게 지어놨는지 가보면 알지만, 음식이고 내부구조고 인테리어고 다 수준급이다. 아주 좋다. 그러나 고작 2000불 국민소득이다. 하지만 그렇게 초라하거나 빈한하지 않다. 이 돈이라는 건 사상이다. 실제와는 좀 다른 문제다. 도대체 이 사람들 생각하는것부터가 문제다. 이런 문제는 플레이아데스놈들이 재벌15세로부터 기인되는 아주 못된 병증이다. 특히 한국놈들인데, 68%가 선비족이고 선비족은 플레이아데스놈들을 대표한다. 일제시대이후 해방시기에도 돈은 있었다. 서기2006년 박종권 재산 : 약 5억원 이완용재산 : 1925년 당시 ‘경성 최대의 현금 부호’라는 명칭에 걸맞게 최소한 3백만원(현재 시가 6백억원) 이상을 소유했다. 민영휘는 ‘조선에서 고금 몇백 년 내에 처음 보는 큰 부자’로 한때 재산 규모가 4천만원(현 시가 8천억원)에 이르렀다 시가 약 3백22억원에 이르는 이해승의 재산이다. 이완용의 증손자 이윤형은 1992년 소송을 통해 서울 서대문구 일대 토지(당시 시가 30억원)를 되찾아 팔고 난 후 캐나다로 이민을 갔다. 윤택영은 일제 강점 직후 한·일 병합에 기여한 공으로 후작 작위와 함께 은사금 50만4천원을 받았다(현재 돈으로는 약 100억원) 박종권은 중국 한고조로부터 侯의 爵位를 받았으나, 재산은 0원이다. 박흥식(朴興植, 1903년 8월 6일 ~ 1994년 5월 10일[1])은 일제강점기의 대표적인 기업인이다. 광복 이후에는 사업에서 손을 떼었지만 1950년부터 1980년까지 30년동안은 다시 기업인으로 활동하였다. 화신백화점 사장으로 잘 알려져 있으며, 제1공화국에서 반민족행위특별조사위원회가 조직되었을 때 첫 번째로 체포된 인물이기도 하다. 호(號)는 산남(山南), 용강(龍岡), 유재(猶齋).(재산규모 약 500억원 정도로 알려지다)

 Nibiru 니비루

니비루는, 전투행성으로 알려져 있다. 이 행성은, 대 말데크전에 투입된 인조행성으로서, 지구인인 우리에게 전달되는 정보로는, 플레이아데스인들이 우주의 자유, 정의, 평화를 위하여 건조한 전투행성으로 알려진다.

행성의 크기는 지구보다 월등하게 커서, 말데크maldek행성 크기에 버금가는 것으로 추정되다.

Maldek(태양계제5행성급, 지구크기의 약 10배이상 12배정도로 추정) 내파를 위해서 투입된 이 전투행성은, 우리가 추론하건대는, Andromeda Galaxy곤충종족수장놈 냉기치놈과, Lyra주신놈들이 합세하여(안드로메다은하계 주신단 놈들 전원이 합세하다), Andromeda Galaxy이전 계까지 소급하여 말데크파괴의 기술을 전수받고 특수제작한 행성이라는 점이다. 플레이아데스에서 만든 행성이 아니다.

maldek는, 우주역사에서 악당으로서 알려져 있지만, 우리가 목격관찰하거나 확인한 바로는 악당이 아니며, 차라리 안드로메다은하계놈들보다 하위우주의 하위종족들 측면에서는 더 나은 면모를 가진다.

지구가 속한 영역은, space-universe로서 누군가가 의도하여 만든 우주이며, 보통 space라고 부른다. 누군가가 인위적으로 의도하여 만드는 우주는 space급이라고 볼수 있고, 이 space급의 우주를 만드는 또 다른 거대인위생성영역을 Universe로 볼수 있으며, 인위적이 아닌, 우주황금율에 의하여 창조되는 영역을 Cosmos로 부를수 있다.

보통은 우리가 사는 Galaxy은하계를 Universe로 볼수도 있고, 이 Galaxy내에 생성되는 각 grade별 영역과 차원의 구분들을 space로 볼수 있다. 그리고 이러한 Galaxy가 무수하게 산재한 거대우주를 Cosmos로 볼수 있겠다.

우리가 보통 말하는 제1우주, 제2우주등의 구분들은, 인위적인 구분으로서, 이 인위우주를 만든 자들이 가진 기준에 의해서 그렇게 이름붙여진 것이고 실제로는 다른 계로 갈 경우, 별로 의미가 없는데, 기초 알고리즘과 사상체계가 다르기 때문이다.

이 등급기준을 만든 자들은 바로 안드로메다은하계놈들이다.

Maldek내파는 대단히 중요하다.

이 Maldek내파사건은, 우주악마마귀들의 대규모발흥을 유발하고, 우리가 사는 은하계 전체에 무한대의 학살과 파괴, 멸족을 유발했기 때문이다.

Andromeda Galaxy는 현대지구로 오게 되면, 마치 우주성자집단이라거나 혹은 우주해탈고차원문명으로 잘못 인식된다. 우리도 한때는 그렇게 보았는데, 여기와서 확인한 결과는 우주 최고의 악독함과 잔인함, 편협함을 지닌 종족집단체로서, 보통 우리가 인간류, 인류, 포유류영장류, 휴먼종들로 인식하는 지구인들의 보편적 문명인식체계와는 전혀 다른 집단구조체계를 가지는 것으로 보였다.

보통 파충류12개종족, 파충류종족들이 악독하고 잔인하고 무자비한 것으로 알려져 있지만, 우리가 확인한 결과로는, 이들보다 더 악독하고 잔인하고 편협한 종족집단체가 안드로메다은하계 185개종족집단체들이다.

이들을 대표하는 집단은 제2차은하대전우주와 라이라우주이다.

그리고 플레이아데스로 불리는 영역과 차원이다.

이들의 악독함과 잔인함, 편협함은, 알려진바대로, 우리 은하계 우주에 무려 56500배에 달하는 악랄하기 이를데 없는 폭정과 폭행, 학살과 멸족사태를 유발시킨다. 보통 허용되는 범주는 약 40000배로 알려져 있다.(과거의 과오,악업대비 가해비율)

maldek을 내파시키려고 냉기치(제2차은하대전위원장이자 12인의 제2차은하대전장군들 한놈이며, 안드로메다은하계 최악의 독종집단체 곤충종족수장놈 고냉기치)는 라이라 최고주신놈들과 합세하여 온갖 지랄을 다 쳐댄다. 그중에 하나가 이건희프로젝트이다.

그리고 플레이아데스프로젝트(세븐시스터즈프로젝트, 박종권지구인을 지구역사최초이자 마지막으로 플레이아데스인으로 승천시킨다는 위증거짓의 프로젝트)이다.

우리가 확인한 바로는, 이 세븐시스터즈프로젝트는 MALDEK수장을 유인하여 제정신을 못차리게 한후, 은하계중앙의 황금용을 만들어준다는 구실로 유혹하여, MALDEK이 처한 위급한 상황을 인식하지 못하게 만들고, 결국 안드로메다은하계놈들이 파놓은 함정에 빠지게 한후, 니비루 행성을 동원한 말데크내파공격을 방어하지 못하게 만들기 위한 교활한 술책이다.

MALDEK수장은, 기묘한 인연관계로서 박종권이와 가족관계를 가지게 되는데, 요것도 안드로메다은하계놈들의 교활사특한 술수다.

그리고는 아무것도 모르게 된 하층지구인박종권이를 부처놈의 설레발이, 예수놈의 설레발이로 유인하여, 라이라집단체와 플레이아데스집단체에 호감을 가지게 한후, 이른바 플레이아데스프로젝트라는 것을 실행시키고, 특혜를 주고 복락을 주는 것처럼 위위장하며, 얼간이 박종권이를 속여넘긴 것이다. 물론 전부 속기만 한 건 아니다. 다만 하층지구인으로서 알수 있는 것에는 제한이 있으므로 그렇게 되는데, 그렇게 만든 놈이 JEHOVAH놈들이다.(JEHOVAH원대, JEHOVAH2대,JEHOVA4대 및 전체 JEHOVAH7인이 전부 그런 짓을 하다)

이건희프로젝트 기간중에는, 박종권이의 상원신을 잡아서 포획하는 일에 주력하게 하고, 하원신은 이미 그 이전에 노예상태로 포박한 상태에서 전지구인(지배계층)에게 나눠먹게 하고, 시기와 때에 걸맞지 않는 첨단의식화를 강제무단공유하게 만든다. 요것도 여호와 2대, 4대놈 짓이다.

게다가 이 지구인이라고 불리는 종족은 실제 지구인은 단 한명도 없고, 전부 거의 TELLURIAN, TERRAN수준인 사람이 아닌 이상한 존재들이다. 

tellurian (plural tellurians)

(astronomy, historical) Alternative spelling of tellurion (“instrument used to show how the rotation of the Earth on its axis and its orbit around the Sun cause day and night and the seasons”) 

(chiefly science fiction) Alternative letter-case form of Tellurian (“inhabitant of the planet Earth”) 

텔루리안이란, 초자연적인 존재로서(지구인인간으로서 보면 그렇다) 보통 지구궤도와 지구축을 지지하고 유지하는 역할을 하거나 혹은 그러한 역할을 하면서 지구에서 사는 거주민들로 설명되고 있다. 이는 일반적으로는 인간존재가 할수 있는 일이 아니고, 초자연적인 원리들로서의 어떤 존재들이 할 일이다. 그런데 이런 자들을 두고 지구인이라고 사전에 표시된다. 어처구니가 없다.

우리가 이승만씨를 통해서 확인한 바로는 텔루리안은 선비족을 의미한다. 우리는 도대체 이해가 안 가는데, 초자연적인 존재(하층지구인 인간사람의 눈으로 보면 그렇다)혹은, 인간류사람보다는 월등하게 발전된 외행성적존재로서의 어떤 의미를 가지는 실체들로서 우리는 텔루리안을 이해했는데, 선비족은, 하등하급 원시미개인을 대표한다는 점이다. 그런데 선비족이 텔루리안이다. 이상하다.

인간존재의 입장에서는 이를테면, 신선도사급 혹은 산신령같은 초월적 실체들이 텔루리안이어야 하는데, 미개원시야만의 대표주자 플레이아데스놈들이 그런 식으로 만들어놓은 것 같다.

게다가 이들은, 인간존재, 하층지구인들보다 더 이기적이고 더 탐욕스럽고 더 시기, 질투하고, 더 잔인하고 악독하다. 실제로는 인간보다 더 나을 것이 없고, 오히려 더 못한 존재들로서 일종의 악마들인데, 어처구니가 없는 것이다.

요 플레이아데스놈들이 어떤 존재들인지는 이들이 벌려놓은 짓거리마다 확인가능하다.

이들이 말하는 등급이라는 것은, 아수라 등급이고 별로 의미가 없는데, 보통 CIVILIZATION이라고 불리는 문명집단체에서는 허락되지 아니하는 원시야만미개의 등급이기 때문이다.

주로 사람때려죽이는 기술, 다른 사람것 빼앗는 기술, 다른 사람정신의식혼백을 제압시키는 기술들인데, 그런 기술을 잘 쓰고 강력한 힘을 발휘하여 웬만한 놈이면 다 때려죽일수 있는 파워만 있으면 등급이 높다고 말하는 것은 안드로메다은하계잡놈들이다. 도대체 어떻게 요런 새끼들이 우주최고의 지위에 있는지 우리는 도저히 이해할수 없다.

이기심, 시기심, 질투심, 탐욕심, 자기만족추구심, 자기쾌락몰두심 같은 요소들은 전혀 무관한데, 그 이유를 보면, 이들 같은 경우는 막상 마음만 먹으면 뭐든 다 할수 있기 때문이다. 다만 이들이 사람이 되면(거짓투사되면 FALSE INJECTTION) 이기심, 시기심, 질투심, 탐욕심등이 인간과 똑같이 생기는데, 그 생기는 강도가 인간의 수십 수백배에 달하고, 만일 만족되지 못하면 무슨 짓이든 다 해서라도 그것을 만족시키려 하는 하등인간의 전형을 보이는 일종의 악마나 마귀들에 지나지 않는다는 점이다.

그러나 등급은 높게 매겨지는데, 그게 안드로메다은하계놈들의 실제 원본원적정체이다.

극단적 원시미개야만성을 지닌 놈들이 안드로메다은하계놈들이다. 

게다가 이들의 주요문제점중 하나는 인색함, 편협함이다. 실제로는 전부 모두가 쓰고도 남을 자원과 양식이 그득하다. 그런데도 이들은 대부분의 우주에서 극단적 궁핍과 고난을 강제한다. 이게 미친새끼들이다. 특히 플레이아데스놈들의 인색함과 편협함은 극단에 이른다.

이들은 악업 KARMA를 부르짖지만, 절대로 그게 아니다.

이들이 지나간 세월 過去惡業으로 인해서 그렇게 했다고 주장하는 일들을 보면, 거의 대부분이, 허용범주를 초과하는 加害이기 때문이다.

일단 우리의 은하계 전체를 놓고 보면, 과거악업이나 잘못들 대비 무려 56500배에 달하는 추가적가해가 자행된다.

보통 우리가 들은 정보로는 일반적으로는 대부분 3600배에 달하는 加害를 당한다. 이것은 은하계 전체규모와는 다른 종족차원이거나 어떤 문명집단차원의 구분화된 가해규모들이다. 개인적인 가해규모도 어마어마해서, 박종권이 같은 경우는 개인적인 과오,잘못,악업대비 무려 8000배가 넘은 무서운 가해를 당했다고 알려진다.

보통 ANDROMEDA GALAXY에서 허용하는 범주는

개인적인 경우는 과거과오, 잘못, 악업대비 12배이내의 처벌이다.

집단종족의 경우는 과거과오, 잘못, 악업대비 약84배이내의 처벌이다.

은하계 전체규모를 본다면, 과거과오, 잘못, 악업대비 약 40000배이내의 처벌이다.

이러한 기준과 허용범주를 참조한다면 이들이 얼마나 악독하고 잔인한 가해를 자행하고 있는지에 대한 증거가 될 것이다.

게다가 요 새끼들이 주력하는 처벌방식은 주로 가난과 궁핍, 헐벗고 굶주리는 것이다. 우리가 목격한 것들은 전체 은하계를 다 살수 있는 정도의 재물과 돈들이 플레이아데스에 산더미처럼 쌓여있다. 전체은하계를 돈주고 살수 있으면 다 살수도 있는 어마어마한 금액의 재물들이 플레이아데스에서 쌓여있지만, 요 새끼들이 얼마나 인색하고 편협한지는 이미 지구시스템의 자본주의를 통해서 잘 알려져 있다.

우리는 산더미처럼 쌓여 있는 우주금괴를 목격관찰했다. 어마어마하다.

플레이아데스다. 그러나 한놈도 예외없이 인색하고 편협하고 까다롭다.

삼성놈들 방식인데, 이건희,이재용이를 보고 삼성놈들을 보면 이 자들이 어떤 방식으로 재물과 돈을 보고 처리하는지 이해할수 있다.

우리는 이런 놈들을 위해서 1,280조원에 달하는 거대한 기여공헌을 했다. 그리고 우리의 기여공헌을 실제 원본심으로는 말로 표현할수 없을정도로 인색편협한 놈인 이건희,이재용이 놈이 자기들이 했다고 증거를 위증하려고 광분하고 있다. 그러나 우리가 보건대는, 이자들은 비록 그렇게 할 능력과 등급이 되더라도 절대로 그렇게 하지 않을 것이라는 점이다. 그게 안드로메다은하계 계열놈들이 가지는 주요 특징이다. 라이라놈들도 마찬가지다. 플레이아데스놈들도 마찬가지다. 源本心 源本來的自己自身的源本人의 源本質상 절대로 그렇게 할 놈들이 아니라는 점은, 플레이아데스놈들이 제놈들 역사기간 1兆年간 좋은 일을 한번도 한 적이 없다는 역사적 사실에서 증거된다. 이들 주장대로 보면, 딱 한번 했다고 주장하는데, 우리가 보면 그렇게 할 놈들이 아니다.

만일 했다면 박종권 플레이아데스인이 그렇게 했을 것이다.

위의 사진그림들은 MALDEK를 내파시키려고 만든 NIBIRU행성의 모습이다. 지구대비 수십배의 크기에 달하는데, 이 정도 행성을 만들려면 적어도 안드로메다은하계급이거나 배후에서 지원해주는 다른 등급이 되어야 할 것 같은 것으로 추정되다.


MALDEK내파는, 이건희프로젝트와 플레이아데스프로젝트를 통해서 박종권이를 이용해서 말데크를 파괴하려는 의도로서 안드로메다은하계 냉기치놈과 라이라주신놈들, 안드로메다은하계주신놈들의 공동모의한 결과로 목격관찰되다. 결국 말데크(고말데크)수장이 이 놈들 술수에 말려들어서, 은하계황금용이 되는 과정을 밟는데, 그 과정에서 냉기치놈과 라이라주신놈들, 안드로메다은하계주신놈들이 타고 들어온다. 그리고는 최근접점까지 타고들어와서 기회를 노리다가 지구인으로 위위형되어진 말데크수장을 내리친 것이다. 그리고 그러한 기세를 몰아서 다시 말데크행성을 직격공격하여 말데크수장과 같은 의식상태로 위위형되어져 속고 있던 말데크인 전원을 폭사시킨 것이다. 여기에 동원된 주요 악당무법자놈들은 Pleiades 4 big Outrageous Fellow 플레이아데스4대무법자로 알려진 미마스, 프타, 아루스, 오자와 네놈이다. 요 새끼들은 전원 박종권으로 위위형하고 거짓투사했는데, 플레이아데스인 전체가 박종권으로 거짓투사되었으며, 니비루인 전체도 박종권으로 거짓투사한다. 이어서 안드로메다은하계주신놈들도 전원 박종권으로 거짓투사한 상태에서 전력을 다해서 말데크인들의 의식을 교란왜곡시키고, 박종권이로 완벽하게 위장한 안드로메다은하계주신 두놈이 말데크수장을 직격하여 내리치면서 니비루 전투위성에서 공명탄을 발사하는데, 요것도 안드로메다은하계를 배후지원하는 식인귀무리들이 만들어준 어떤 다른 영역과 차원에서 발사된 공명자폭탄들인 것으로 추정된다. 이런 사태를 예감한 것은 오래전이다. 우리는 은하계 황금용으로 되어진 말데크수장을 무섭게 노려본다. 정신을 차리라는 의미로 그렇게 했을 것이다.

문제의 핵심은 그 이후의 일이다.

말데크를 내파시키는데 성공한 안드로메다은하계놈들과 이들의 수족이 되는 제2차은하대전군세(12인의 장군들이며 이들중 11인이 안드로메다인들이다)와 플레이아데스군세(4대무법자놈들)이 합세하여 全體銀河系로 進軍해가기 始作한 것이다.

그리고 이것만이 아니다.

안드로메다은하계와 同級의 他界를 攻擊하여(말데크를 내파시킨 기술을 응용하여, 제놈들과 동급수준의 발전된 다른세계를 공격하다) 그 세계 전체에 致命打를 입히고 內破시키려 試圖한다. 요것도 전부 유사휴먼종족이었던 고위등급의 박종권원체를 복제복사하여 안드로메다은하계주신놈들이 전부 처발라 입고, 전원이 박종권유사휴먼인으로 위장하여 접근한후, 그렇게 자행했을 것임은 매우 분명하다. 

이와같은 만행들은 결국 은하계 전체 주민들을 무서운 살육과 파괴 학살과 멸족의 대재앙으로 몰고 간다. 요 씹새끼들이 주로 쓰는 수법은 유사휴먼종족계의 고위등급인 박종권이를 복제 복사하여 위위형하고 거짓투사하여 완벽하게 선량하고 좋은 의도를 가진 휴먼인으로 위위장하고 상대에게 접근해서 뒤통수를 치는 수법이다. 요 씨팔놈들의 발호는 고위휴먼계 상천계까지 침투하여, 휴먼계열 전체를 파멸시키고 이들 전체에 대해서 통제장악하려는 음모,흉계까지 겹치고 있다.

만일 그렇게 된다면 더 큰 비극과 재앙이 초래될 것이다.

MALDEK을 내파시키는데 최고최대의 공헌을 한 놈은 이재용이 놈이고 이건희놈이다. 요 두놈이 무수한 학살과 멸족을 자행하게 만든 기본원인이유들이 된다.

이재용이 놈은, 니비루인들의 약 75%에 달하고, 플레이아데스인들의 약 65%에 달하는 대표캐릭터로서 실제로는 전체플레이아데스인들이 모두 이재용이 놈이다.

이재용이 놈이 박종권이를 완전히 죽인 놈중 한놈이고 요 새끼가 살인도 불사하여 이미 나를 살인한 것으로 추론된다. 실제 지구인인간박종권이를 살인했다고 판단된다. 그리고 요 새끼가 말데크를 파멸시킨 공로로서, 17개성단의 지도자로 추대된다. 이어서 플레이아데스제2대조사놈이 되더니, 결국에는 준은하대전계까지 박종권이 것을(박종권이를 살인하여 죽인후 가둔다 그리고 이용해 처 먹는다) 도둑질강탈질하여 가지고, 올라간다. 요 새끼가 바로 말데크 공격으로 멸절된 이른바 4000만명의 준은하대전인들을 지도한 놈의 정체다. 대과거로 거슬러가는데, 이 우주에서의 시공간개념이란 지구인이 아는바와 같지 않다는 점만 알아두자.

그리고 요 새끼가 지구에서는 삼성그룹회장직으로 있는 이재용이 놈이다. 전부 같은 이재용이 놈이다. 이것이 가능하다는 것은, 웬만한 놈들이면 다 안다. 가능하다.

MALDEK를 내파시키고, 전체은하계 원주민들을 대규모 학살멸족처리되게 만들며, 아틀란티스인 전체를 멸족시키는데 결정적 공헌과 기여를 한 이재용이와 이건희를 무조건 참수형에 처하고 무조건 죽여없애도록 지시명령처리기록되다. 요 두 새끼는 그대로 둘 경우, 안드로메다은하계와 동급의 타계까지 공격해서 다른 대규모 우주에 대재앙을 초래할 대단히 위험한 재앙들에 해당되므로 무조건 발견 즉시 죽여버리도록 지시명령처리기록되다.

아울러서 이 두놈에 의하여 완전히 잡아 먹히다 시피한 박종권이를 무슨 수를 써서라도 원상회복토록 조치토록 지시명령처리기록되다.(불가능할 경우 탈출로를 확보토록 지시명령처리기록되다.)MALDEK을 내파시키기 이전의 NIBIRU놈들과 PLEIADES놈들을 집중공격하여 멸족시키며, MALDEK의 내파를 최대한 방어토록 지시명령처리기록되다. MURDEK, MALDEK는 LYRA, PLEIADES계열들을 무조건 멸족처리해야 할 것으로 지시명령처리기록되다. 아울러서 ANDROMEDA GALAXY놈들과 일전을 치를 각오로서 대결해야 하는 것으로서 지시명령처리기록되다.

안드로메다은하계놈들과 라이라놈들, 플레이아데스놈들이 이미 박종권이 원본을 다 빨아 처 먹은 것으로 판단되므로 이후 박종권이 및 박종권계열인으로 위위장하여 거짓투사하여 나타나는 놈들에 대해서 무조건 살해사형제거소멸토록 지시명령처리기록되다.

drawathe李健熙이건희1942年1月9日-2020年10月25日三星创始人李秉喆三子三星集团第二任会长authorityhypostasisanatomy

drawathe李健熙-ic이건희-ic1942年1月9日-2020年10月25日三星创始人李秉喆三子三星集团第二任会长-icauthorityhypostasisanatomy-ic

drawathe李健熙-y이건희-y1942年1月9日-2020年10月25日三星创始人李秉喆三子三星集团第二任会长-yauthorityhypostasisanatomy-y

drawathe李健熙이건희1942年1月9日-2020年10月25日三星创始人李秉喆三子三星集团第二任会长authorityhypostasisanatomy

drawathe李健熙的이건희的1942年1月9日-2020年10月25日的三星创始人李秉喆三子三星集团第二任会长的authorityhypostasisanatomy的

drawathe2ndgalaxywar12Theleaderorcommanderofanarmyauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawathe地球人지구인tellurianEarthpersonearthmanearthwomanEarthianEarthling準同級他界authorityhypostasisanatomy

drawatheĀtlantis準同級他界quasi-tobeonthesameleveldifferentcivilizationauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawatheSevenSisters準同級他界quasi-tobeonthesameleveldifferentstarclusterauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawathe地球人지구인tellurianEarthpersonearthmanearthwomanEarthianEarthlingauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawathe2ndgalaxywar準同級他界authorityhypostasisanatomy

drawatheAndromeda Galaxy準同級他界authorityhypostasisanatomy

drawatheAndromeda Galaxy同級他界authorityhypostasisanatomy

drawathethe devilauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawathereptilereptilologyauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawatheReptiliaherpetologyreptologyauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawathethereptilereptiliannesspainterlinessperennialistsauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawathereptilianareptilereptiliousreptitiousreptilelikeThesaurusauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawatheThesaurusdespicablereptilianbrainTiplerianpatrilineauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawathePrinceofDarknessThesaurusSatanauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawathepowerofdarknessdevildomdevildemonLuciferBeelzebubafreetfoulfiendauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawathetellurianunliteraltellurionearthlytelluricterreneterrestrialauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawatheEarthpersonEarthpersonsEarthpeopleThesaurusEarthlingauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawatheEarthwomanEarthwomenThesaurusEarthlingauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawatheEarthmanEarthmenEartherEarthlingThesaurusEarthlingauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawatheEarthianRhaetianRhætianThesaurusEarthlingauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawatheEarthgirlEartherEarthlingThesaurusEarthlingrealrightauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawatheearthlinghalteringheartlinglatheringrealthingauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawathedevilryOldNickOldSerpentThesaurusSatanevilizevilifyauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawathedevilincarnatedesignerlessgostcompassionatedemonophobiaalightauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawatheanincarnatefienddopefiendlubberfiendarch-fiendhellspawnauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawatheritualabuseBiellaApollyonhoàngtheprinceofthisworldauthorityhypostasisanatomy

drawathedemondevilmaliciousspiritmahoundmodendaimonAmidonImondadomainauthorityhypostasisanatomy 


ATLANTIS를 내파시킨 기술은 MALDEK을 내파시킨 기술을 응용한 것이며, ATLANTIS인들은 이점을 감안하여 판단토록 지시명령처리기록되다.

ANDROMEDA GALAXY와 同級의 他界 聯合元老院

ANDROMEDA GALAXY와 準同級의 他界 聯合元老院

제2차은하대전계와 同級의 他界 聯合元老院

제2차은하대전계와 準同級의 他界 聯合元老院

MURDEK연합원로원

MALDEK연합원로원

ATLANTIS연합원로원 참조

----------------------------------------------

이승만대통령이 과거 머물렀다고 알려진 제주도 여관 사진이 올라온다. 그런데 이상하다. 우리가 보면, 너무도 누추하고 초라하다. 

우리는 경제문외한이라서 잘 모른다. 하지만, 아무리 못사는 나라라고 해도, 부자는 있고, 세금도 걷는다. 게다가 국가원수면, 아무리 가난하고 궁핍해도, 이른바 통치자금들이 있기 마련이다. 그리고 비록 돈이 없다고 해도, 건물하나 짓는건, 조선왕조시대에도 왕명하나면 그냥 짓는다.

아니 고조선시대라고 해도 왕이 마음만 먹으면 그럴듯한 건물하나 짓는건 돈이 있고 없고의 문제가 아니다.

돈문제가 아니고, 통치전략이다. 미국을 대상으로 구걸하려고 그런 짓을 한 것 같다는 추론이다.

우리가 대통령인데, 제주도 가서 이런 여관에서 잠을 잡니다라고 하소연하기 위한 홍보전략이다.

북한 같은 경우는 이른바 주석궁이니 뭐니 해서 그런 초라한 꼴은 보이지 않는다.

이 문제는 민심이나 기타 다른 문제와는 무관계하다.

각 지역별로 국가정책상, 깨끗하고 정갈한 호텔하나정도는 국가시책으로 짓게 하면 그만이다.

내가 대통령이면 그렇게 한다.

우리가 알기로는 일제시대에도 부자가 많았다. 회사운영하고 일제와 밀착해서 돈을 번 부자들이 제법 있었다고 안다.

일본제국시대의 위위형박종권(이 사람이 나인지는 모르겠다. 하지만 그런 것처럼 설레발이를 친다)이는 50원을 받았다고 말해진다. 이 당시 월급 50원이면 많이 받는거다.

교사봉급이 20원정도 했다고 하는데 많이 받은거다. 하지만 막상 박종권이인지는 모른다. 

국제외교정책상, 구걸은 하지 말자. 태국을 가면 왕궁을 비롯해서 볼거리가 많다. 베트남도 가면 불란서 시대의 유풍들이 많고 나라 전체가 초라하지 않다. 베트남은, 하노이같은 경우는 호숫가에서 커피를 마시고 운치있게 지낼수 있는 장소도 있고, 건물들은 대부분 프랑스 불란서방식의 운치있는 건물들이다. 그러나 이 나라의 공식 GDP는 고작 500불선이다. 이정도는 이승만 정권당시의 한국과 유사한 수준이다.  공식 GDP는 그렇지만 막상 가보면, 그렇게 초라하지 않다. 운치있고 볼만하다. 오히려 한국보다 나아보인다.

못먹고 못산다고 주절대던 시대는 베트남 수준이다. 그러나 베트남은 그렇지 않다.

태국도 고작 2000불 수준이다. 그것도 현대에 와서도 그렇다. 하지만 가보면 그게 아니다. 태국방콕 호텔이 얼마나 좋게 지어놨는지 가보면 알지만, 음식이고 내부구조고 인테리어고 다 수준급이다. 아주 좋다. 그러나 고작 2000불 국민소득이다. 하지만 그렇게 초라하거나 빈한하지 않다. 

이 돈이라는 건 사상이다. 실제와는 좀 다른 문제다.

도대체 이 사람들 생각하는것부터가 문제다.


이런 문제는 플레이아데스놈들이 재벌15세로부터 기인되는 아주 못된 병증이다. 특히 한국놈들인데, 68%가 선비족이고 선비족은 플레이아데스놈들을 대표한다.


일제시대이후 해방시기에도 돈은 있었다.

서기2006년 박종권 재산 : 약 5억원

이완용재산 :

1925년 당시 ‘경성 최대의 현금 부호’라는 명칭에 걸맞게 최소한 3백만원(현재 시가 6백억원) 이상을 소유했다.

민영휘는 ‘조선에서 고금 몇백 년 내에 처음 보는 큰 부자’로 한때 재산 규모가 4천만원(현 시가 8천억원)에 이르렀다

시가 약 3백22억원에 이르는 이해승의 재산이다.

이완용의 증손자 이윤형은 1992년 소송을 통해 서울 서대문구 일대 토지(당시 시가 30억원)를 되찾아 팔고 난 후 캐나다로 이민을 갔다.

윤택영은 일제 강점 직후 한·일 병합에 기여한 공으로 후작 작위와 함께 은사금 50만4천원을 받았다(현재 돈으로는 약 100억원)

박종권은 중국 한고조로부터 侯의 爵位를 받았으나, 재산은 0원이다.

박흥식(朴興植, 1903년 8월 6일 ~ 1994년 5월 10일[1])은 일제강점기의 대표적인 기업인이다. 광복 이후에는 사업에서 손을 떼었지만 1950년부터 1980년까지 30년동안은 다시 기업인으로 활동하였다. 화신백화점 사장으로 잘 알려져 있으며, 제1공화국에서 반민족행위특별조사위원회가 조직되었을 때 첫 번째로 체포된 인물이기도 하다. 호(號)는 산남(山南), 용강(龍岡), 유재(猶齋).(재산규모 약 500억원 정도로 알려지다)










































































댓글

이 블로그의 인기 게시물

Bullying is the use of force, coercion, hurtful teasing or threat, to abuse, aggressively dominate or intimidate. The behavior is often repeated and habitual. One essential prerequisite is the perception (by the bully or by others) of an imbalance of physical or social power. This imbalance distinguishes bullying from conflict.[1][2] Bullying is a subcategory of aggressive behavior characterized by hostile intent, imbalance of power and repetition over a period of time.[3] Bullying is the activity of repeated, aggressive behavior intended to hurt another individual, physically, mentally or emotionally. Bullying can be done individually or by a group, called mobbing,[4] in which the bully may have one or more followers who are willing to assist the primary bully or who reinforce the bully by providing positive feedback such as laughing.[5] Bullying in school and the workplace is also referred to as "peer abuse".[6] Robert W. Fuller has analyzed bullying in the context of rankism.[7] The Swedish-Norwegian researcher Dan Olweus says bullying occurs when a person is "exposed, repeatedly and over time, to negative actions on the part of one or more other persons",[8] and that negative actions occur "when a person intentionally inflicts injury or discomfort upon another person, through physical contact, through words or in other ways".[8] Individual bullying is usually characterized by a person behaving in a certain way to gain power over another person.[9] A bullying culture can develop in any context in which humans interact with each other. This may include school, family, the workplace,[10] the home, and neighborhoods. The main platform for bullying in contemporary culture is on social media websites.[11] In a 2012 study of male adolescent American football players, "the strongest predictor [of bullying] was the perception of whether the most influential male in a player's life would approve of the bullying behavior."[12] A study by The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health in 2019 showed a relationship between social media use by girls and an increase in their exposure to bullying.[13] Bullying may be defined in many different ways. In the United Kingdom, there is no legal definition of bullying,[14] while some states in the United States have laws against it.[15] Bullying is divided into four basic types of abuse – psychological (sometimes called emotional or relational), verbal, physical, and cyber.[16] Behaviors used to assert such domination may include physical assault or coercion, verbal harassment, or threat, and such acts may be directed repeatedly toward particular targets. Rationalizations of such behavior sometimes include differences of social class, race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, appearance, behavior, body language, personality, reputation, lineage, strength, size, or ability.[17][18][19] Etymology The word "bully" was first used in the 1530s meaning "sweetheart", applied to either sex, from the Dutch: boel, "lover, brother", probably diminutive of Middle High German: buole, "brother", of uncertain origin (compare with the German buhle "lover"). The meaning deteriorated through the 17th century through "fine fellow", "blusterer", to "harasser of the weak". This may have been as a connecting sense between "lover" and "ruffian" as in "protector of a prostitute", which was one sense of "bully" (though not specifically attested until 1706). The verb "to bully" is first attested in 1710.[20] In the past, in American culture, the term has been used differently, as an exclamation/exhortation, in particular famously associated with Theodore Roosevelt[21] and continuing to the present in the bully pulpit, Roosevelt's coining and also as faint/deprecating praise ("bully for him"). Types Bullying has been classified by the body of literature into different types. These can be in the form of nonverbal, verbal, or physical behavior. Another classification is based on perpetrators or the participants involved, so that the types include individual and collective bullying. Other interpretation also cite emotional and relational bullying in addition to physical harm inflicted towards another person or even property.[22] There is also the case of the more recent phenomenon called cyberbullying. Physical, verbal, and relational bullying are most prevalent in primary school and could also begin much earlier while continuing into later stages in individuals lives. Individual Individual bullying tactics are perpetrated by a single person against a victim or victims.[23] Individual bullying can be classified into four types outlined below:[24] Physical Physical bullying is any bullying that hurts someone's body or damages their possessions. Stealing, shoving, hitting, fighting, and intentionally destroying someone's property are types of physical bullying. Physical bullying is rarely the first form of bullying that a victim will experience. Often bullying will begin in a different form and later progress to physical violence. In physical bullying the main weapon the bully uses is his/her body, or some part thereof; or an object as a weapon when attacking his/her victim. Sometimes groups of young adults will target and alienate a peer because of some adolescent prejudice. This can quickly lead to a situation where they are being taunted, tortured, and "beaten up" by their classmates. Physical bullying will often escalate over time, and can lead to a detrimental or fatal ending, and therefore many try to stop it quickly to prevent any further escalation.[25] Verbal Verbal bullying is one of the most common types of bullying. This is any bullying that is conducted by speaking, other use of the voice, or some form of body language and does not involve any physical contact. Bullying usually begins at this stage and includes any of the following: Derogatory name-calling and nicknaming Spreading rumors or lying about someone Threatening someone Yelling at or talking to someone in a rude or unkind tone of voice, especially without justifiable cause Mocking someone's voice or style of speaking Laughing at someone Use of body language (i.e., the middle finger) to torture someone Making insults or otherwise making fun of someone In verbal bullying, the main weapon the bully uses is voice. In many cases, verbal bullying is common in both genders, but girls are more likely to perform it. Girls, in general, are more subtle with insults than boys. Girls use verbal bullying, as well as social exclusion techniques, to dominate and control other individuals and show their superiority and power, often to try to impress someone they idolize. Many boys are subtle enough to use verbal techniques for domination when they want to avoid the trouble that can come with physically bullying someone else.[26] Relational Relational bullying (sometimes referred to as social aggression) is the type of bullying that uses relationships to hurt others.[27] The term also denotes any bullying that is done with the intent to hurt somebody's reputation or social standing which can also link in with the techniques included in physical and verbal bullying. Relational bullying is a form of bullying common among youth, but particularly upon girls. Social exclusion (slighting or making someone feel "left out") is one of the most common types of relational bullying. Relational bullying can be used as a tool by bullies to both improve their social standing and control others. Unlike physical bullying which is obvious, relational bullying is not overt and can continue for a long time without being noticed.[28] Cyber Cyberbullying is the use of technology to harass, threaten, embarrass, or target another person. When an adult is involved, it may meet the definition of cyber-harassment or cyberstalking, a crime that can have legal consequences and involve jail time.[29] This includes bullying by use of email, instant messaging, social media websites (such as Facebook), text messages, and cell phones. It is stated that Cyberbullying is more common in secondary school than in primary school.[24] Collective Collective bullying tactics are employed by more than one individual against a victim or victims. Collective bullying is known as mobbing, and can include any of the individual types of bullying. Trolling behavior on social media, although generally assumed to be individual in nature by the casual reader, is sometime organized efforts by sponsored astroturfers. Mobbing Main article: Mobbing Mobbing refers to the bullying of an individual by a group, in any context, such as a family, peer group, school, workplace, neighborhood, community, or online. When it occurs as emotional abuse in the workplace, such as "ganging up" by co-workers, subordinates or superiors, to force someone out of the workplace through rumor, innuendo, intimidation, humiliation, discrediting, and isolation, it is also referred to as malicious, nonsexual, nonracial/racial, general harassment.[30] Characteristics Bullies and accomplices Studies have shown that envy and resentment may be motives for bullying.[31] Research on the self-esteem of bullies has produced equivocal results.[32][33] While some bullies are arrogant and narcissistic,[34] they can also use bullying as a tool to conceal shame or anxiety or to boost self-esteem: by demeaning others, the abuser feels empowered.[35] Bullies may bully out of jealousy or because they themselves are bullied.[36] Psychologist Roy Baumeister asserts that people who are prone to abusive behavior tend to have inflated but fragile egos. Because they think too highly of themselves, they are frequently offended by the criticisms and lack of deference of other people, and react to this disrespect with violence and insults.[37][full citation needed] Researchers have identified other risk factors such as depression[38] and personality disorders,[39] as well as quickness to anger and use of force, addiction to aggressive behaviors, mistaking others' actions as hostile, concern with preserving self-image, and engaging in obsessive or rigid actions.[40] A combination of these factors may also be causes of this behavior.[41] In one study of youth, a combination of antisocial traits and depression was found to be the best predictor of youth violence, whereas video game violence and television violence exposure were not predictive of these behaviors.[42] Bullying may also result from a genetic predisposition or a brain abnormality in the bully.[43] While parents can help a toddler develop emotional regulation and control to restrict aggressive behavior, some children fail to develop these skills due to insecure attachment with their families, ineffective discipline, and environmental factors such as a stressful home life and hostile siblings.[24] Moreover, according to some researchers, bullies may be inclined toward negativity and perform poorly academically. Dr. Cook says, "A typical bully has trouble resolving problems with others and also has trouble academically. He or she usually has negative attitudes and beliefs about others, feels negatively toward himself/herself, comes from a family environment characterized by conflict and poor parenting, perceives school as negative and is negatively influenced by peers."[44] Contrarily, some researchers have suggested that some bullies are psychologically strongest and have high social standing among their peers, while their targets are emotionally distressed and socially marginalized.[45] Peer groups often promote the bully's actions, and members of these peer groups also engage in behaviors, such as mocking, excluding, punching, and insulting one another as a source of entertainment.[24] Other researchers also argued that a minority of the bullies, those who are not in-turn bullied, enjoy going to school, and are least likely to take days off sick.[46] Research indicates that adults who bully have authoritarian personalities, combined with a strong need to control or dominate.[47] It has also been suggested that a prejudicial view of subordinates can be a particularly strong risk factor.[48] In a recent study, bullies showed lower school performance-related self-esteem than non-involved students. They also showed higher social self-esteem than victims of traditional bullying.[49] Brain studies have shown that the section of the brain associated with reward becomes active when bullies are shown a video of someone inflicting pain on another.[50] Bystanders Often, bullying takes place in the presence of a large group of relatively uninvolved bystanders. In many cases, it is the bully's ability to create the illusion they have the support of the majority present that instills the fear of "speaking out" in protestation of the bullying activities being observed by the group. Unless the "bully mentality" is effectively challenged in any given group in its early stages, it often becomes an accepted, or supported, norm within the group.[51][52] Unless action is taken, a "culture of bullying" is often perpetuated within a group for months, years, or longer.[53] Bystanders who have been able to establish their own "friendship group" or "support group" have been found to be far more likely to opt to speak out against bullying behavior than those who have not.[54][55] In addition to communication of clear expectations that bystanders should intervene and increasing individual self-efficacy, there is growing research to suggest interventions should build on the foundation that bullying is morally wrong.[56] Among adults, being a bystander to workplace bullying was linked to depression.[57] Victims Dr. Cook says, "A typical victim is likely to be aggressive, lack social skills, think negative thoughts, experience difficulties in solving social problems, come from a negative family, school and community environments and be noticeably rejected and isolated by peers."[44] Victims often have characteristics such as being physically and mentally weak, as well as being easily distraught emotionally. They may also have physical characteristics that make them easier targets for bullies such as being overweight or having some type of physical deformity. Boys are more likely to be victims of physical bullying while girls are more likely to be bullied indirectly.[58] Low levels of self-esteem has been identified as a frequent antecedent of bullying victimization. Victims of traditional bullying tend to have lower global, social, body-related, and emotional self-esteem compared to uninvolved students.[49][59][60][61][62] Victims of cyberbullying, on the other hand, may not have lower self-esteem scores than uninvolved students but might have higher body-related self-esteem than both victims of traditional bullying and bullies.[49] It has also been shown that victims are more likely to employ self-defeating or self-deprecating humor intended to entertain others at the expense of themselves and their own feelings.[63] The results of a meta-analysis conducted by Cook and published by the American Psychological Association in 2010 concluded the main risk factors for children and adolescents being bullied, and also for becoming bullies, are the lack of social problem-solving skills.[44] Children who are bullied often show physical or emotional signs, such as: being afraid to attend school, complaining of headaches or a loss of appetite, a lack of interest in school activities, spending time with friends or family, reluctance to go out in public for fear they may encounter their bullies in public places other than school, and having an overall sense of sadness. Effects Unbalanced scales.svg This section may lend undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, or controversies. Please help to create a more balanced presentation. Discuss and resolve this issue before removing this message. (May 2014) Mona O'Moore of the Anti-Bullying Centre at Trinity College in Dublin, has written, "There is a growing body of research which indicates that individuals, whether child or adult, who are persistently subjected to abusive behavior are at risk of stress related illness which can sometimes lead to suicide"[64] Those who have been the targets of bullying can develop long-term emotional and behavioral problems. Bullying can cause loneliness, depression, anxiety, lead to low self-esteem and increased susceptibility to illness.[65] Bullying has also been shown to cause maladjustment in young children, and targets of bullying who were also bullies themselves exhibit even greater social difficulties.[49][66] A mental health report also found that bullying was linked to eating disorders, anxiety, body dysmorphia and other negative psychological effects.[67] Both victims and perpetrators have been shown to exhibit higher levels of loneliness.[49] Suicide Main articles: Bullying and suicide and List of suicides that have been attributed to bullying Even though there is evidence that bullying increases the risk of suicide, bullying alone does not cause suicide. Depression is one of the main reasons why kids who are bullied die by suicide.[68] It is estimated that between 15 and 25 children die by suicide every year in the UK alone because they are being bullied.[69] Certain groups seem to incur a higher risk for suicide, such as Native Americans, Alaskan Natives, Asian Americans, and LGBT people. When someone feels unsupported by family or friends, it can make the situation much worse for the victim.[70] In a self-report study completed in New York by 9th through 12th graders, victims of bullying reported more depressive symptoms and psychological distress than those who did not experience bullying.[71] All types of involvement in bullying among both boys and girls is associated with depression even a couple years later.[72] Another study that followed up with Finnish teens two years after the initial survey showed that depression and suicidal ideation is higher with teens who are bullied than those who did not report experiencing bullying.[72] A Dutch longitudinal study on elementary students reported that boys who are bully-victims, who play both roles of a victim and a bully, were more likely to experience depression or serious suicidal ideation than the other roles, victims or bullies only, while girls who have any involvement in bullying have a higher level of risk for depression.[73] In a study of high school students completed in Boston, students who self reported being victims of bullying were more likely to consider suicide when compared to youth who did not report being bullied.[74] The same study also showed a higher risk of suicidal consideration in youth who report being a perpetrator, victim, or victim-perpetrator. Victims and victim-bullies are associated with a higher risk of suicide attempts. The place where youth live also appears to differentiate their bullying experiences such that those living in more urban areas who reported both being bullied and bullying others appear to show higher risk of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts.[74] A national survey given to American 6th through 10th grade students found that cyberbullying victims experience a higher level of depression than victims experiencing other forms of bullying. This can be related to the anonymity behind social media.[75] If a teen is being bullied and is displaying symptoms of depression it should be questioned and interventions should be implemented.[72] The Danish study showed that kids who are bullied talked to their parents and teachers about it and some reported a decrease in bullying or a stop in the bullying after a teacher or parent intervened. The study emphasizes the importance of implementing program-collaborations in schools to have programs and anti-bullying interventions in place to prevent and properly intervene when it occurs.[73] The study also shows the importance of having parents and teachers talk to the bullies about their bullying behavior in order to provide the necessary support for those experiencing bullying.[73] While some people find it very easy to ignore a bully, others may find it very difficult and reach a breaking point. There have been cases of apparent bullying suicides that have been reported closely by the media. These include the deaths of Ryan Halligan, Phoebe Prince, Dawn-Marie Wesley, Nicola Ann Raphael, Megan Meier, Audrie Pott, Tyler Clementi, Jamey Rodemeyer, Kenneth Weishuhn, Jadin Bell, Kelly Yeomans, Rehtaeh Parsons, Amanda Todd, Brodie Panlock,[76] Jessica Haffer,[77] Hamed Nastoh,[78] Sladjana Vidovic,[79] April Himes,[80] Cherice Moralez[81] and Rebecca Ann Sedwick.[82] According to the suicide awareness voices for education, suicide is one of the leading causes of death for youth from 15 to 24 years old. Over 16 percent of students seriously consider suicide, 13 percent create a plan, and 8 percent have made a serious attempt.[83] Strength and wisdom Some have argued that bullying can teach life lessons and instill strength. Helene Guldberg, a child development academic, sparked controversy when she argued that being a target of bullying can teach a child "how to manage disputes and boost their ability to interact with others", and that teachers should not intervene but leave children to respond to the bullying themselves.[84] Others, however, have pointed out that this is only true for normal peer conflicts but not for bullying cases.[85] The teaching of anti-bullying coping skills to children, carers and teachers has been found to be an effective long-term means of reducing bullying incidence rates and a valuable skill-set for individuals.[86] Testosterone production Statistically controlling for age and pubertal status, results indicated that on average verbally bullied girls produced less testosterone, and verbally bullied boys produced more testosterone than their nonbullied counterparts.[87] Dark triad Main article: Dark triad Research on the dark triad (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy) indicate a correlation with bullying as part of evidence of the aversive nature of those traits.[88] Projection Main article: Psychological projection A bully may project his/her own feelings of vulnerability onto the target(s) of the bullying activity. Despite the fact that a bully's typically denigrating activities are aimed at the bully's targets, the true source of such negativity is ultimately almost always found in the bully's own sense of personal insecurity and/or vulnerability.[89] Such aggressive projections of displaced negative emotions can occur anywhere from the micro-level of interpersonal relationships, all the way up through to the macro-level of international politics, or even international armed conflict.[90] Emotional intelligence Main article: Bullying and emotional intelligence Bullying is abusive social interaction between peers which can include aggression, harassment, and violence. Bullying is typically repetitive and enacted by those who are in a position of power over the victim. A growing body of research illustrates a significant relationship between bullying and emotional intelligence (EI). Mayer et al., (2008) defines the dimensions of overall EI as "accurately perceiving emotion, using emotions to facilitate thought, understanding emotion, and managing emotion".[91] The concept combines emotional and intellectual processes.[92] Lower emotional intelligence appears to be related to involvement in bullying, as the bully and/or the victim of bullying. EI seems to play an important role in both bullying behavior and victimization in bullying; given that EI is illustrated to be malleable, EI education could greatly improve bullying prevention and intervention initiatives.[93] Context Internet Main article: Cyberbullying Cyberbullying is any bullying done through the use of technology. This form of bullying can easily go undetected because of lack of authoritative (including parental) supervision.[94] Because bullies can pose as someone else, it is the most anonymous form of bullying.[95] Cyberbullying includes abuse using email, instant messaging, text messaging, websites, and social networking sites.[96] Particular watchdog organizations have been designed to contain the spread of cyberbullying.[97] Disability Main article: Disability bullying Disabled people are disproportionately affected by bullying and abuse, and such activity has been cited as a hate crime.[98] The bullying is not limited to those who are visibly disabled, such as wheelchair users or physically deformed such as those with a cleft lip, but also those with developmental disabilities such as autism[99][100] and developmental coordination disorder.[101][102] There is an additional problem that those with learning disabilities are often not as able to explain things to other people, so are more likely to be disbelieved or ignored if they do complain.[citation needed] Homosexuality Main article: Gay bashing Gay bullying and gay bashing designate direct or indirect verbal or physical actions by a person or group against someone who is gay or lesbian, or perceived to be so due to rumors or because they are considered to fit gay stereotypes. Gay and lesbian youth are more likely than straight youth to report bullying, as well as be bullied.[103][104] Law Main article: Legal abuse Legal bullying is the bringing of a vexatious legal action to control and punish a person. Legal bullying can often take the form of frivolous, repetitive, or burdensome lawsuits brought to intimidate the defendant into submitting to the litigant's request, not because of the legal merit of the litigant's position, but principally due to the defendant's inability to maintain the legal battle. This can also take the form of Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP). It was partially concern about the potential for this kind of abuse that helped to fuel the protests against SOPA and PIPA in the United States in 2011 and 2012.[citation needed] Military Main articles: Bullying in the military and Dedovshchina In 2000, the UK Ministry of Defence (MOD) defined bullying as "the use of physical strength or the abuse of authority to intimidate or victimize others, or to give unlawful punishments".[105] Some argue that this behaviour should be allowed, due to ways in which "soldiering" is different from other occupations. Soldiers expected to risk their lives should, according to them, develop strength of body and spirit to accept bullying.[106] Parenting See also: Child abuse, Narcissistic parent, and Parental narcissistic abuse Parents who may displace their anger, insecurity, or a persistent need to dominate and control upon their children in excessive ways have been proven to increase the likelihood that their own children will in turn become overly aggressive or controlling towards their peers.[107] The American Psychological Association advises on its website that parents who may suspect their own children may be engaging in bullying activities among their peers should carefully consider the examples which they themselves may be setting for their own children regarding how they typically interact with their own peers, colleagues, and children.[108] Prison Main article: Prisoner abuse The prison environment is known for bullying. An additional complication is the staff and their relationships with the inmates. Thus, the following possible bullying scenarios are possible: Inmate bullies inmate (echoing school bullying) Staff bullies inmate Staff bullies staff (a manifestation of workplace bullying) Inmate bullies staff School Main article: School bullying A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention graphic presenting school anti-bullying guidelines. It is important to distinguish school bullying that per definition has the goal of harming the victim from normal peer conflict that is an inherent part of everyday school life and often promotes social development.[109] Unlike normal conflict, bullying is a systematic and repeated abuse committed intentionally by another student who has more power (physical, social, or otherwise). Bullying can occur in nearly any part in or around the school building, although it may occur more frequently during physical education classes and activities such as recess. Bullying also takes place in school hallways, bathrooms, on school buses and while waiting for buses, and in classes that require group work and/or after school activities. Bullying in school sometimes consists of a group of students taking advantage of or isolating one student in particular and gaining the loyalty of bystanders who want to avoid becoming the next target. In the 2011 documentary Bully, we see first hand the torture that kids go through both in school and while on the school bus. As the movie follows around a few kids we see how bullying affects them both at school as well as in their homes. While bullying has no age limit, these bullies may taunt and tease their target before finally physically bullying them. Bystanders typically choose to either participate or watch, sometimes out of fear of becoming the next target. Teachers play an important role in bullying prevention and intervention because they are the adults who spend most of their time with the students.[110][111] Bullying can, however, also be perpetrated by teachers and the school system itself; there is an inherent power differential in the system that can easily predispose to subtle or covert abuse (relational aggression or passive aggression), humiliation, or exclusion—even while maintaining overt commitments to anti-bullying policies.[112][113][114] In 2016, in Canada, a North American legal precedent was set by a mother and her son, after the son was bullied in his public school. The mother and son won a court case against the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board, making this the first case in North America where a school board has been found negligent in a bullying case for failing to meet the standard of care (the "duty of care" that the school board owes to its students). Thus, it sets a precedent of a school board being found liable in negligence for harm caused to a child, because they failed to protect a child from the bullying actions of other students. There has been only one other similar bullying case and it was won in Australia in 2013 (Oyston v. St. Patricks College, 2013).[115] Heterosexuality Main article: Sexual bullying See also: Slut-shaming Sexual bullying is "any bullying behaviour, whether physical or non-physical, that is based on a person's sexuality or gender. It is when sexuality or gender is used as a weapon by boys or girls towards other boys or girls – although it is more commonly directed at girls. It can be carried out to a person's face, behind their back or through the use of technology."[116] Transsexuality Main article: Trans bashing Trans bashing is the act of victimizing a person physically, sexually, or verbally because they are transgender or transsexual.[117] Unlike gay bashing, it is committed because of the target's actual or perceived gender identity, not sexual orientation. Work Main article: Workplace bullying Workplace bullying occurs when an employee experiences a persistent pattern of mistreatment from others in the workplace that causes harm.[118] Workplace bullying can include such tactics as verbal, nonverbal, psychological, physical abuse and humiliation. This type of workplace aggression is particularly difficult because, unlike the typical forms of school bullying, workplace bullies often operate within the established rules and policies of their organization and their society. Bullying in the workplace is in the majority of cases reported as having been perpetrated by someone in authority over the target. Bullies can also be peers, and occasionally can be subordinates.[119] The first known documented use of "workplace bullying" is in 1992 in a book by Andrea Adams called Bullying at Work: How to Confront and Overcome It.[120][121] Research has also investigated the impact of the larger organizational context on bullying as well as the group-level processes that impact on the incidence, and maintenance of bullying behavior.[122] Bullying can be covert or overt. It may be missed by superiors or known by many throughout the organization. Negative effects are not limited to the targeted individuals, and may lead to a decline in employee morale and a change in organizational culture.[10] A Cochrane Collaboration systematic review has found very low quality evidence to suggest that organizational and individual interventions may prevent bullying behaviors in the workplace.[123] Academia Main article: Bullying in academia Bullying in academia is workplace bullying of scholars and staff in academia, especially places of higher education such as colleges and universities. It is believed to be common, although has not received as much attention from researchers as bullying in some other contexts.[124] Blue-collar jobs Bullying has been identified as prominent in blue-collar jobs, including on oil rigs and in mechanic shops and machine shops. It is thought that intimidation and fear of retribution cause decreased incident reports. In industry sectors dominated by males, typically of little education, where disclosure of incidents are seen as effeminate, reporting in the socioeconomic and cultural milieu of such industries would likely lead to a vicious circle. This is often used in combination with manipulation and coercion of facts to gain favour among higher-ranking administrators.[125] Information technology Main article: Bullying in information technology A culture of bullying is common in information technology (IT), leading to high sickness rates, low morale, poor productivity, and high staff-turnover.[126] Deadline-driven project work and stressed-out managers take their toll on IT workers.[127] Courts Main article: Bullying in the legal profession Bullying in the legal profession is believed to be more common than in some other professions. It is believed that its adversarial, hierarchical tradition contributes towards this.[128] Women, trainees and solicitors who have been qualified for five years or less are more affected, as are ethnic minority lawyers and lesbian, gay and bisexual lawyers.[129] Medicine Main articles: Bullying in medicine and Bullying in nursing Bullying in the medical profession is common, particularly of student or trainee doctors and of nurses. It is thought that this is at least in part an outcome of conservative traditional hierarchical structures and teaching methods in the medical profession, which may result in a bullying cycle. Even though The American Nurses Association believes that all nursing personnel have the right to work in safe, non-abusive environments, bullying has been identified as being particularly prevalent in the nursing profession although the reasons are not clear. It is thought that relational aggression (psychological aspects of bullying such as gossiping and intimidation) are relevant. Relational aggression has been studied among girls but not so much among adult women.[127][130] Teaching Main article: Bullying in teaching School teachers are commonly the subject of bullying but they are also sometimes the originators of bullying within a school environment. Machines Children have been observed bullying anthropomorphic robots designed to assist the elderly. Their attacks start with blocking the robots' paths of movement and then escalate to verbal abuse, hitting and destroying the object. Seventy-five percent of the kids interviewed perceived the robot as "human-like" yet decided to abuse it anyway, while 35% of the kids who beat up the robot did so "for enjoyment".[131] Prevention Bullying prevention is the collective effort to prevent, reduce and stop bullying.[132] Many campaigns and events are designated to bullying prevention throughout the world. Bullying prevention campaigns and events include Anti-Bullying Day, Anti-Bullying Week, International Day of Pink, International STAND UP to Bullying Day and National Bullying Prevention Month. Anti-bullying laws in the U.S. have also been enacted in 23 of its 50 states, making bullying in schools illegal.[133] Responses Bullying is typically ongoing and not isolated behaviour. Common responses are to try to ignore it, to confront the bullies, or to turn to an authority figure. Ignoring it often does nothing to stop the bullying continuing, and it can become worse over time.[134] It can be important to address bullying behaviour early on, as it can be easier to control the earlier it is detected.[135] Bystanders play an important role in responding to bullying, as doing nothing can encourage it to continue, while small steps that oppose the behaviour can reduce it.[136] Authority figures can play an important role, such as parents or teachers in child or adolescent situations, or supervisors, human-resources staff or parent-bodies in workplace and volunteer settings. In the school context, teachers who set clear boundaries, communicate seriously that bullying behavior is unacceptable and will not be tolerated, and involve school administrators have been shown to reduce bullying.[137] Discussing bullying and its consequences with the whole class is also an important intervention that not only reduces bullying, but also encourages other students to step in and stop bullying even before it reaches its full form.[138] In general, authority figures can be influential in recognising and stopping bullying behaviour, and creating an environment that does not encourage or promote bullying.[139][140] In many situations, authority figures are untrained and unqualified, do not know how to respond, and can make the situation worse.[141] In some cases the authority figures even support the people doing the bullying, facilitating it continuing and increasing the isolation and marginalising of the target.[142] Some of the most effective ways to respond are to recognise that harmful behaviour is taking place, and to create an environment where it will not continue.[143] See also Abuse Abusive power and control Bashing (pejorative) Brodie's Law (act) Bully (2011 film) Bullying and suicide Bullying of students in higher education Discrimination Harassment Hate crime Hazing Mobbing Passive-aggressive behavior Psychological trauma Relational aggression Scapegoating Social dominance orientation Social exclusion Social media and suicide Social rejection Social undermining Taunting Teasing The Bully: A Discussion and Activity Story (book) Victimisation Workplace bullying References

Bullying is the use of force, coercion, hurtful teasing or threat, to abuse, aggressively dominate or intimidate. The behavior is often repeated and habitual. One essential prerequisite is the perception (by the bully or by others) of an imbalance of physical or social power. This imbalance distinguishes bullying from conflict.[1][2] Bullying is a subcategory of aggressive behavior characterized by hostile intent, imbalance of power and repetition over a period of time.[3] Bullying is the activity of repeated, aggressive behavior intended to hurt another individual, physically, mentally or emotionally. Bullying can be done individually or by a group, called mobbing,[4] in which the bully may have one or more followers who are willing to assist the primary bully or who reinforce the bully by providing positive feedback such as laughing.[5] Bullying in school and the workplace is also referred to as "peer abuse".[6] Robert W. Fuller has analyzed bullying in the context of rankism.[7] The Swedish-Norwegian researcher Dan Olweus says bullying occurs when a person is "exposed, repeatedly and over time, to negative actions on the part of one or more other persons",[8] and that negative actions occur "when a person intentionally inflicts injury or discomfort upon another person, through physical contact, through words or in other ways".[8] Individual bullying is usually characterized by a person behaving in a certain way to gain power over another person.[9] A bullying culture can develop in any context in which humans interact with each other. This may include school, family, the workplace,[10] the home, and neighborhoods. The main platform for bullying in contemporary culture is on social media websites.[11] In a 2012 study of male adolescent American football players, "the strongest predictor [of bullying] was the perception of whether the most influential male in a player's life would approve of the bullying behavior."[12] A study by The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health in 2019 showed a relationship between social media use by girls and an increase in their exposure to bullying.[13] Bullying may be defined in many different ways. In the United Kingdom, there is no legal definition of bullying,[14] while some states in the United States have laws against it.[15] Bullying is divided into four basic types of abuse – psychological (sometimes called emotional or relational), verbal, physical, and cyber.[16] Behaviors used to assert such domination may include physical assault or coercion, verbal harassment, or threat, and such acts may be directed repeatedly toward particular targets. Rationalizations of such behavior sometimes include differences of social class, race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, appearance, behavior, body language, personality, reputation, lineage, strength, size, or ability.[17][18][19] Etymology The word "bully" was first used in the 1530s meaning "sweetheart", applied to either sex, from the Dutch: boel, "lover, brother", probably diminutive of Middle High German: buole, "brother", of uncertain origin (compare with the German buhle "lover"). The meaning deteriorated through the 17th century through "fine fellow", "blusterer", to "harasser of the weak". This may have been as a connecting sense between "lover" and "ruffian" as in "protector of a prostitute", which was one sense of "bully" (though not specifically attested until 1706). The verb "to bully" is first attested in 1710.[20] In the past, in American culture, the term has been used differently, as an exclamation/exhortation, in particular famously associated with Theodore Roosevelt[21] and continuing to the present in the bully pulpit, Roosevelt's coining and also as faint/deprecating praise ("bully for him"). Types Bullying has been classified by the body of literature into different types. These can be in the form of nonverbal, verbal, or physical behavior. Another classification is based on perpetrators or the participants involved, so that the types include individual and collective bullying. Other interpretation also cite emotional and relational bullying in addition to physical harm inflicted towards another person or even property.[22] There is also the case of the more recent phenomenon called cyberbullying. Physical, verbal, and relational bullying are most prevalent in primary school and could also begin much earlier while continuing into later stages in individuals lives. Individual Individual bullying tactics are perpetrated by a single person against a victim or victims.[23] Individual bullying can be classified into four types outlined below:[24] Physical Physical bullying is any bullying that hurts someone's body or damages their possessions. Stealing, shoving, hitting, fighting, and intentionally destroying someone's property are types of physical bullying. Physical bullying is rarely the first form of bullying that a victim will experience. Often bullying will begin in a different form and later progress to physical violence. In physical bullying the main weapon the bully uses is his/her body, or some part thereof; or an object as a weapon when attacking his/her victim. Sometimes groups of young adults will target and alienate a peer because of some adolescent prejudice. This can quickly lead to a situation where they are being taunted, tortured, and "beaten up" by their classmates. Physical bullying will often escalate over time, and can lead to a detrimental or fatal ending, and therefore many try to stop it quickly to prevent any further escalation.[25] Verbal Verbal bullying is one of the most common types of bullying. This is any bullying that is conducted by speaking, other use of the voice, or some form of body language and does not involve any physical contact. Bullying usually begins at this stage and includes any of the following: Derogatory name-calling and nicknaming Spreading rumors or lying about someone Threatening someone Yelling at or talking to someone in a rude or unkind tone of voice, especially without justifiable cause Mocking someone's voice or style of speaking Laughing at someone Use of body language (i.e., the middle finger) to torture someone Making insults or otherwise making fun of someone In verbal bullying, the main weapon the bully uses is voice. In many cases, verbal bullying is common in both genders, but girls are more likely to perform it. Girls, in general, are more subtle with insults than boys. Girls use verbal bullying, as well as social exclusion techniques, to dominate and control other individuals and show their superiority and power, often to try to impress someone they idolize. Many boys are subtle enough to use verbal techniques for domination when they want to avoid the trouble that can come with physically bullying someone else.[26] Relational Relational bullying (sometimes referred to as social aggression) is the type of bullying that uses relationships to hurt others.[27] The term also denotes any bullying that is done with the intent to hurt somebody's reputation or social standing which can also link in with the techniques included in physical and verbal bullying. Relational bullying is a form of bullying common among youth, but particularly upon girls. Social exclusion (slighting or making someone feel "left out") is one of the most common types of relational bullying. Relational bullying can be used as a tool by bullies to both improve their social standing and control others. Unlike physical bullying which is obvious, relational bullying is not overt and can continue for a long time without being noticed.[28] Cyber Cyberbullying is the use of technology to harass, threaten, embarrass, or target another person. When an adult is involved, it may meet the definition of cyber-harassment or cyberstalking, a crime that can have legal consequences and involve jail time.[29] This includes bullying by use of email, instant messaging, social media websites (such as Facebook), text messages, and cell phones. It is stated that Cyberbullying is more common in secondary school than in primary school.[24] Collective Collective bullying tactics are employed by more than one individual against a victim or victims. Collective bullying is known as mobbing, and can include any of the individual types of bullying. Trolling behavior on social media, although generally assumed to be individual in nature by the casual reader, is sometime organized efforts by sponsored astroturfers. Mobbing Main article: Mobbing Mobbing refers to the bullying of an individual by a group, in any context, such as a family, peer group, school, workplace, neighborhood, community, or online. When it occurs as emotional abuse in the workplace, such as "ganging up" by co-workers, subordinates or superiors, to force someone out of the workplace through rumor, innuendo, intimidation, humiliation, discrediting, and isolation, it is also referred to as malicious, nonsexual, nonracial/racial, general harassment.[30] Characteristics Bullies and accomplices Studies have shown that envy and resentment may be motives for bullying.[31] Research on the self-esteem of bullies has produced equivocal results.[32][33] While some bullies are arrogant and narcissistic,[34] they can also use bullying as a tool to conceal shame or anxiety or to boost self-esteem: by demeaning others, the abuser feels empowered.[35] Bullies may bully out of jealousy or because they themselves are bullied.[36] Psychologist Roy Baumeister asserts that people who are prone to abusive behavior tend to have inflated but fragile egos. Because they think too highly of themselves, they are frequently offended by the criticisms and lack of deference of other people, and react to this disrespect with violence and insults.[37][full citation needed] Researchers have identified other risk factors such as depression[38] and personality disorders,[39] as well as quickness to anger and use of force, addiction to aggressive behaviors, mistaking others' actions as hostile, concern with preserving self-image, and engaging in obsessive or rigid actions.[40] A combination of these factors may also be causes of this behavior.[41] In one study of youth, a combination of antisocial traits and depression was found to be the best predictor of youth violence, whereas video game violence and television violence exposure were not predictive of these behaviors.[42] Bullying may also result from a genetic predisposition or a brain abnormality in the bully.[43] While parents can help a toddler develop emotional regulation and control to restrict aggressive behavior, some children fail to develop these skills due to insecure attachment with their families, ineffective discipline, and environmental factors such as a stressful home life and hostile siblings.[24] Moreover, according to some researchers, bullies may be inclined toward negativity and perform poorly academically. Dr. Cook says, "A typical bully has trouble resolving problems with others and also has trouble academically. He or she usually has negative attitudes and beliefs about others, feels negatively toward himself/herself, comes from a family environment characterized by conflict and poor parenting, perceives school as negative and is negatively influenced by peers."[44] Contrarily, some researchers have suggested that some bullies are psychologically strongest and have high social standing among their peers, while their targets are emotionally distressed and socially marginalized.[45] Peer groups often promote the bully's actions, and members of these peer groups also engage in behaviors, such as mocking, excluding, punching, and insulting one another as a source of entertainment.[24] Other researchers also argued that a minority of the bullies, those who are not in-turn bullied, enjoy going to school, and are least likely to take days off sick.[46] Research indicates that adults who bully have authoritarian personalities, combined with a strong need to control or dominate.[47] It has also been suggested that a prejudicial view of subordinates can be a particularly strong risk factor.[48] In a recent study, bullies showed lower school performance-related self-esteem than non-involved students. They also showed higher social self-esteem than victims of traditional bullying.[49] Brain studies have shown that the section of the brain associated with reward becomes active when bullies are shown a video of someone inflicting pain on another.[50] Bystanders Often, bullying takes place in the presence of a large group of relatively uninvolved bystanders. In many cases, it is the bully's ability to create the illusion they have the support of the majority present that instills the fear of "speaking out" in protestation of the bullying activities being observed by the group. Unless the "bully mentality" is effectively challenged in any given group in its early stages, it often becomes an accepted, or supported, norm within the group.[51][52] Unless action is taken, a "culture of bullying" is often perpetuated within a group for months, years, or longer.[53] Bystanders who have been able to establish their own "friendship group" or "support group" have been found to be far more likely to opt to speak out against bullying behavior than those who have not.[54][55] In addition to communication of clear expectations that bystanders should intervene and increasing individual self-efficacy, there is growing research to suggest interventions should build on the foundation that bullying is morally wrong.[56] Among adults, being a bystander to workplace bullying was linked to depression.[57] Victims Dr. Cook says, "A typical victim is likely to be aggressive, lack social skills, think negative thoughts, experience difficulties in solving social problems, come from a negative family, school and community environments and be noticeably rejected and isolated by peers."[44] Victims often have characteristics such as being physically and mentally weak, as well as being easily distraught emotionally. They may also have physical characteristics that make them easier targets for bullies such as being overweight or having some type of physical deformity. Boys are more likely to be victims of physical bullying while girls are more likely to be bullied indirectly.[58] Low levels of self-esteem has been identified as a frequent antecedent of bullying victimization. Victims of traditional bullying tend to have lower global, social, body-related, and emotional self-esteem compared to uninvolved students.[49][59][60][61][62] Victims of cyberbullying, on the other hand, may not have lower self-esteem scores than uninvolved students but might have higher body-related self-esteem than both victims of traditional bullying and bullies.[49] It has also been shown that victims are more likely to employ self-defeating or self-deprecating humor intended to entertain others at the expense of themselves and their own feelings.[63] The results of a meta-analysis conducted by Cook and published by the American Psychological Association in 2010 concluded the main risk factors for children and adolescents being bullied, and also for becoming bullies, are the lack of social problem-solving skills.[44] Children who are bullied often show physical or emotional signs, such as: being afraid to attend school, complaining of headaches or a loss of appetite, a lack of interest in school activities, spending time with friends or family, reluctance to go out in public for fear they may encounter their bullies in public places other than school, and having an overall sense of sadness. Effects Unbalanced scales.svg This section may lend undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, or controversies. Please help to create a more balanced presentation. Discuss and resolve this issue before removing this message. (May 2014) Mona O'Moore of the Anti-Bullying Centre at Trinity College in Dublin, has written, "There is a growing body of research which indicates that individuals, whether child or adult, who are persistently subjected to abusive behavior are at risk of stress related illness which can sometimes lead to suicide"[64] Those who have been the targets of bullying can develop long-term emotional and behavioral problems. Bullying can cause loneliness, depression, anxiety, lead to low self-esteem and increased susceptibility to illness.[65] Bullying has also been shown to cause maladjustment in young children, and targets of bullying who were also bullies themselves exhibit even greater social difficulties.[49][66] A mental health report also found that bullying was linked to eating disorders, anxiety, body dysmorphia and other negative psychological effects.[67] Both victims and perpetrators have been shown to exhibit higher levels of loneliness.[49] Suicide Main articles: Bullying and suicide and List of suicides that have been attributed to bullying Even though there is evidence that bullying increases the risk of suicide, bullying alone does not cause suicide. Depression is one of the main reasons why kids who are bullied die by suicide.[68] It is estimated that between 15 and 25 children die by suicide every year in the UK alone because they are being bullied.[69] Certain groups seem to incur a higher risk for suicide, such as Native Americans, Alaskan Natives, Asian Americans, and LGBT people. When someone feels unsupported by family or friends, it can make the situation much worse for the victim.[70] In a self-report study completed in New York by 9th through 12th graders, victims of bullying reported more depressive symptoms and psychological distress than those who did not experience bullying.[71] All types of involvement in bullying among both boys and girls is associated with depression even a couple years later.[72] Another study that followed up with Finnish teens two years after the initial survey showed that depression and suicidal ideation is higher with teens who are bullied than those who did not report experiencing bullying.[72] A Dutch longitudinal study on elementary students reported that boys who are bully-victims, who play both roles of a victim and a bully, were more likely to experience depression or serious suicidal ideation than the other roles, victims or bullies only, while girls who have any involvement in bullying have a higher level of risk for depression.[73] In a study of high school students completed in Boston, students who self reported being victims of bullying were more likely to consider suicide when compared to youth who did not report being bullied.[74] The same study also showed a higher risk of suicidal consideration in youth who report being a perpetrator, victim, or victim-perpetrator. Victims and victim-bullies are associated with a higher risk of suicide attempts. The place where youth live also appears to differentiate their bullying experiences such that those living in more urban areas who reported both being bullied and bullying others appear to show higher risk of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts.[74] A national survey given to American 6th through 10th grade students found that cyberbullying victims experience a higher level of depression than victims experiencing other forms of bullying. This can be related to the anonymity behind social media.[75] If a teen is being bullied and is displaying symptoms of depression it should be questioned and interventions should be implemented.[72] The Danish study showed that kids who are bullied talked to their parents and teachers about it and some reported a decrease in bullying or a stop in the bullying after a teacher or parent intervened. The study emphasizes the importance of implementing program-collaborations in schools to have programs and anti-bullying interventions in place to prevent and properly intervene when it occurs.[73] The study also shows the importance of having parents and teachers talk to the bullies about their bullying behavior in order to provide the necessary support for those experiencing bullying.[73] While some people find it very easy to ignore a bully, others may find it very difficult and reach a breaking point. There have been cases of apparent bullying suicides that have been reported closely by the media. These include the deaths of Ryan Halligan, Phoebe Prince, Dawn-Marie Wesley, Nicola Ann Raphael, Megan Meier, Audrie Pott, Tyler Clementi, Jamey Rodemeyer, Kenneth Weishuhn, Jadin Bell, Kelly Yeomans, Rehtaeh Parsons, Amanda Todd, Brodie Panlock,[76] Jessica Haffer,[77] Hamed Nastoh,[78] Sladjana Vidovic,[79] April Himes,[80] Cherice Moralez[81] and Rebecca Ann Sedwick.[82] According to the suicide awareness voices for education, suicide is one of the leading causes of death for youth from 15 to 24 years old. Over 16 percent of students seriously consider suicide, 13 percent create a plan, and 8 percent have made a serious attempt.[83] Strength and wisdom Some have argued that bullying can teach life lessons and instill strength. Helene Guldberg, a child development academic, sparked controversy when she argued that being a target of bullying can teach a child "how to manage disputes and boost their ability to interact with others", and that teachers should not intervene but leave children to respond to the bullying themselves.[84] Others, however, have pointed out that this is only true for normal peer conflicts but not for bullying cases.[85] The teaching of anti-bullying coping skills to children, carers and teachers has been found to be an effective long-term means of reducing bullying incidence rates and a valuable skill-set for individuals.[86] Testosterone production Statistically controlling for age and pubertal status, results indicated that on average verbally bullied girls produced less testosterone, and verbally bullied boys produced more testosterone than their nonbullied counterparts.[87] Dark triad Main article: Dark triad Research on the dark triad (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy) indicate a correlation with bullying as part of evidence of the aversive nature of those traits.[88] Projection Main article: Psychological projection A bully may project his/her own feelings of vulnerability onto the target(s) of the bullying activity. Despite the fact that a bully's typically denigrating activities are aimed at the bully's targets, the true source of such negativity is ultimately almost always found in the bully's own sense of personal insecurity and/or vulnerability.[89] Such aggressive projections of displaced negative emotions can occur anywhere from the micro-level of interpersonal relationships, all the way up through to the macro-level of international politics, or even international armed conflict.[90] Emotional intelligence Main article: Bullying and emotional intelligence Bullying is abusive social interaction between peers which can include aggression, harassment, and violence. Bullying is typically repetitive and enacted by those who are in a position of power over the victim. A growing body of research illustrates a significant relationship between bullying and emotional intelligence (EI). Mayer et al., (2008) defines the dimensions of overall EI as "accurately perceiving emotion, using emotions to facilitate thought, understanding emotion, and managing emotion".[91] The concept combines emotional and intellectual processes.[92] Lower emotional intelligence appears to be related to involvement in bullying, as the bully and/or the victim of bullying. EI seems to play an important role in both bullying behavior and victimization in bullying; given that EI is illustrated to be malleable, EI education could greatly improve bullying prevention and intervention initiatives.[93] Context Internet Main article: Cyberbullying Cyberbullying is any bullying done through the use of technology. This form of bullying can easily go undetected because of lack of authoritative (including parental) supervision.[94] Because bullies can pose as someone else, it is the most anonymous form of bullying.[95] Cyberbullying includes abuse using email, instant messaging, text messaging, websites, and social networking sites.[96] Particular watchdog organizations have been designed to contain the spread of cyberbullying.[97] Disability Main article: Disability bullying Disabled people are disproportionately affected by bullying and abuse, and such activity has been cited as a hate crime.[98] The bullying is not limited to those who are visibly disabled, such as wheelchair users or physically deformed such as those with a cleft lip, but also those with developmental disabilities such as autism[99][100] and developmental coordination disorder.[101][102] There is an additional problem that those with learning disabilities are often not as able to explain things to other people, so are more likely to be disbelieved or ignored if they do complain.[citation needed] Homosexuality Main article: Gay bashing Gay bullying and gay bashing designate direct or indirect verbal or physical actions by a person or group against someone who is gay or lesbian, or perceived to be so due to rumors or because they are considered to fit gay stereotypes. Gay and lesbian youth are more likely than straight youth to report bullying, as well as be bullied.[103][104] Law Main article: Legal abuse Legal bullying is the bringing of a vexatious legal action to control and punish a person. Legal bullying can often take the form of frivolous, repetitive, or burdensome lawsuits brought to intimidate the defendant into submitting to the litigant's request, not because of the legal merit of the litigant's position, but principally due to the defendant's inability to maintain the legal battle. This can also take the form of Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP). It was partially concern about the potential for this kind of abuse that helped to fuel the protests against SOPA and PIPA in the United States in 2011 and 2012.[citation needed] Military Main articles: Bullying in the military and Dedovshchina In 2000, the UK Ministry of Defence (MOD) defined bullying as "the use of physical strength or the abuse of authority to intimidate or victimize others, or to give unlawful punishments".[105] Some argue that this behaviour should be allowed, due to ways in which "soldiering" is different from other occupations. Soldiers expected to risk their lives should, according to them, develop strength of body and spirit to accept bullying.[106] Parenting See also: Child abuse, Narcissistic parent, and Parental narcissistic abuse Parents who may displace their anger, insecurity, or a persistent need to dominate and control upon their children in excessive ways have been proven to increase the likelihood that their own children will in turn become overly aggressive or controlling towards their peers.[107] The American Psychological Association advises on its website that parents who may suspect their own children may be engaging in bullying activities among their peers should carefully consider the examples which they themselves may be setting for their own children regarding how they typically interact with their own peers, colleagues, and children.[108] Prison Main article: Prisoner abuse The prison environment is known for bullying. An additional complication is the staff and their relationships with the inmates. Thus, the following possible bullying scenarios are possible: Inmate bullies inmate (echoing school bullying) Staff bullies inmate Staff bullies staff (a manifestation of workplace bullying) Inmate bullies staff School Main article: School bullying A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention graphic presenting school anti-bullying guidelines. It is important to distinguish school bullying that per definition has the goal of harming the victim from normal peer conflict that is an inherent part of everyday school life and often promotes social development.[109] Unlike normal conflict, bullying is a systematic and repeated abuse committed intentionally by another student who has more power (physical, social, or otherwise). Bullying can occur in nearly any part in or around the school building, although it may occur more frequently during physical education classes and activities such as recess. Bullying also takes place in school hallways, bathrooms, on school buses and while waiting for buses, and in classes that require group work and/or after school activities. Bullying in school sometimes consists of a group of students taking advantage of or isolating one student in particular and gaining the loyalty of bystanders who want to avoid becoming the next target. In the 2011 documentary Bully, we see first hand the torture that kids go through both in school and while on the school bus. As the movie follows around a few kids we see how bullying affects them both at school as well as in their homes. While bullying has no age limit, these bullies may taunt and tease their target before finally physically bullying them. Bystanders typically choose to either participate or watch, sometimes out of fear of becoming the next target. Teachers play an important role in bullying prevention and intervention because they are the adults who spend most of their time with the students.[110][111] Bullying can, however, also be perpetrated by teachers and the school system itself; there is an inherent power differential in the system that can easily predispose to subtle or covert abuse (relational aggression or passive aggression), humiliation, or exclusion—even while maintaining overt commitments to anti-bullying policies.[112][113][114] In 2016, in Canada, a North American legal precedent was set by a mother and her son, after the son was bullied in his public school. The mother and son won a court case against the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board, making this the first case in North America where a school board has been found negligent in a bullying case for failing to meet the standard of care (the "duty of care" that the school board owes to its students). Thus, it sets a precedent of a school board being found liable in negligence for harm caused to a child, because they failed to protect a child from the bullying actions of other students. There has been only one other similar bullying case and it was won in Australia in 2013 (Oyston v. St. Patricks College, 2013).[115] Heterosexuality Main article: Sexual bullying See also: Slut-shaming Sexual bullying is "any bullying behaviour, whether physical or non-physical, that is based on a person's sexuality or gender. It is when sexuality or gender is used as a weapon by boys or girls towards other boys or girls – although it is more commonly directed at girls. It can be carried out to a person's face, behind their back or through the use of technology."[116] Transsexuality Main article: Trans bashing Trans bashing is the act of victimizing a person physically, sexually, or verbally because they are transgender or transsexual.[117] Unlike gay bashing, it is committed because of the target's actual or perceived gender identity, not sexual orientation. Work Main article: Workplace bullying Workplace bullying occurs when an employee experiences a persistent pattern of mistreatment from others in the workplace that causes harm.[118] Workplace bullying can include such tactics as verbal, nonverbal, psychological, physical abuse and humiliation. This type of workplace aggression is particularly difficult because, unlike the typical forms of school bullying, workplace bullies often operate within the established rules and policies of their organization and their society. Bullying in the workplace is in the majority of cases reported as having been perpetrated by someone in authority over the target. Bullies can also be peers, and occasionally can be subordinates.[119] The first known documented use of "workplace bullying" is in 1992 in a book by Andrea Adams called Bullying at Work: How to Confront and Overcome It.[120][121] Research has also investigated the impact of the larger organizational context on bullying as well as the group-level processes that impact on the incidence, and maintenance of bullying behavior.[122] Bullying can be covert or overt. It may be missed by superiors or known by many throughout the organization. Negative effects are not limited to the targeted individuals, and may lead to a decline in employee morale and a change in organizational culture.[10] A Cochrane Collaboration systematic review has found very low quality evidence to suggest that organizational and individual interventions may prevent bullying behaviors in the workplace.[123] Academia Main article: Bullying in academia Bullying in academia is workplace bullying of scholars and staff in academia, especially places of higher education such as colleges and universities. It is believed to be common, although has not received as much attention from researchers as bullying in some other contexts.[124] Blue-collar jobs Bullying has been identified as prominent in blue-collar jobs, including on oil rigs and in mechanic shops and machine shops. It is thought that intimidation and fear of retribution cause decreased incident reports. In industry sectors dominated by males, typically of little education, where disclosure of incidents are seen as effeminate, reporting in the socioeconomic and cultural milieu of such industries would likely lead to a vicious circle. This is often used in combination with manipulation and coercion of facts to gain favour among higher-ranking administrators.[125] Information technology Main article: Bullying in information technology A culture of bullying is common in information technology (IT), leading to high sickness rates, low morale, poor productivity, and high staff-turnover.[126] Deadline-driven project work and stressed-out managers take their toll on IT workers.[127] Courts Main article: Bullying in the legal profession Bullying in the legal profession is believed to be more common than in some other professions. It is believed that its adversarial, hierarchical tradition contributes towards this.[128] Women, trainees and solicitors who have been qualified for five years or less are more affected, as are ethnic minority lawyers and lesbian, gay and bisexual lawyers.[129] Medicine Main articles: Bullying in medicine and Bullying in nursing Bullying in the medical profession is common, particularly of student or trainee doctors and of nurses. It is thought that this is at least in part an outcome of conservative traditional hierarchical structures and teaching methods in the medical profession, which may result in a bullying cycle. Even though The American Nurses Association believes that all nursing personnel have the right to work in safe, non-abusive environments, bullying has been identified as being particularly prevalent in the nursing profession although the reasons are not clear. It is thought that relational aggression (psychological aspects of bullying such as gossiping and intimidation) are relevant. Relational aggression has been studied among girls but not so much among adult women.[127][130] Teaching Main article: Bullying in teaching School teachers are commonly the subject of bullying but they are also sometimes the originators of bullying within a school environment. Machines Children have been observed bullying anthropomorphic robots designed to assist the elderly. Their attacks start with blocking the robots' paths of movement and then escalate to verbal abuse, hitting and destroying the object. Seventy-five percent of the kids interviewed perceived the robot as "human-like" yet decided to abuse it anyway, while 35% of the kids who beat up the robot did so "for enjoyment".[131] Prevention Bullying prevention is the collective effort to prevent, reduce and stop bullying.[132] Many campaigns and events are designated to bullying prevention throughout the world. Bullying prevention campaigns and events include Anti-Bullying Day, Anti-Bullying Week, International Day of Pink, International STAND UP to Bullying Day and National Bullying Prevention Month. Anti-bullying laws in the U.S. have also been enacted in 23 of its 50 states, making bullying in schools illegal.[133] Responses Bullying is typically ongoing and not isolated behaviour. Common responses are to try to ignore it, to confront the bullies, or to turn to an authority figure. Ignoring it often does nothing to stop the bullying continuing, and it can become worse over time.[134] It can be important to address bullying behaviour early on, as it can be easier to control the earlier it is detected.[135] Bystanders play an important role in responding to bullying, as doing nothing can encourage it to continue, while small steps that oppose the behaviour can reduce it.[136] Authority figures can play an important role, such as parents or teachers in child or adolescent situations, or supervisors, human-resources staff or parent-bodies in workplace and volunteer settings. In the school context, teachers who set clear boundaries, communicate seriously that bullying behavior is unacceptable and will not be tolerated, and involve school administrators have been shown to reduce bullying.[137] Discussing bullying and its consequences with the whole class is also an important intervention that not only reduces bullying, but also encourages other students to step in and stop bullying even before it reaches its full form.[138] In general, authority figures can be influential in recognising and stopping bullying behaviour, and creating an environment that does not encourage or promote bullying.[139][140] In many situations, authority figures are untrained and unqualified, do not know how to respond, and can make the situation worse.[141] In some cases the authority figures even support the people doing the bullying, facilitating it continuing and increasing the isolation and marginalising of the target.[142] Some of the most effective ways to respond are to recognise that harmful behaviour is taking place, and to create an environment where it will not continue.[143] See also Abuse Abusive power and control Bashing (pejorative) Brodie's Law (act) Bully (2011 film) Bullying and suicide Bullying of students in higher education Discrimination Harassment Hate crime Hazing Mobbing Passive-aggressive behavior Psychological trauma Relational aggression Scapegoating Social dominance orientation Social exclusion Social media and suicide Social rejection Social undermining Taunting Teasing The Bully: A Discussion and Activity Story (book) Victimisation Workplace bullying References